Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMurray, Gabrielen
dc.contributor.authorRenals, Steveen
dc.contributor.authorCarletta, Jeanen
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Johannaen
dc.date.accessioned2006-05-12T12:51:27Z
dc.date.available2006-05-12T12:51:27Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.citationIn ACL 2005 Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for MT and/or Summarization, 2005.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1842/1039
dc.description.abstractThe research below explores schemes for evaluating automatic summaries of business meetings, using the ICSI Meeting Corpus. Both automatic and subjective evaluations were carried out, with a central interest being whether or not the two types of evaluations correlate with each other. The evaluation metrics were used to compare and contrast differing approaches to automatic summarization, the deterioration of summary quality on ASR output versus manual transcripts, and to determine whether manual extracts are rated significantly higher than automatic extracts.en
dc.format.extent72057 bytesen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectSpeech Recognitionen
dc.subjectsummarizationen
dc.subjectamien
dc.titleEvaluating Automatic Summaries of Meeting Recordingsen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record