Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHaszeldine, R Stuart
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-08T09:51:28Z
dc.date.available2016-03-08T09:51:28Z
dc.date.issued20/06/2012
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1842/15687
dc.descriptionThis article by Zoback and Gorelick (PNAS 2012, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1202473109) presents a well argued and fundamental challenge to be proposition that geological storage of CO2 by deep injection of fluid can be an important technology against climate change. The two authors are experienced and well respected senior professors at Stanford University, USA. The challenge certainly deserves to be heard, considered, and rebutted if possible by CCS proponents.en
dc.description.abstractThis article by Zoback and Gorelick (PNAS 2012, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1202473109) presents a well argued and fundamental challenge to be proposition that geological storage of CO2 by deep injection of fluid can be an important technology against climate change. The two authors are experienced and well respected senior professors at Stanford University, USA. The challenge certainly deserves to be heard, considered, and rebutted if possible by CCS proponents.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherScottish Carbon Capture and Storage (SCCS)en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWP SCCS 2012-01en
dc.subjectCarbon Capture and Storageen
dc.subjectCCSen
dc.subjectClimate Changeen
dc.subjectinjectionen
dc.subjectgeological storageen
dc.titleComment by Stuart Haszeldine on Zoback and Gorelick (2012)en
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record