Encoding contributions to mnemonic discrimination and its age-related decline
View/ Open
Pidgeon2015.pdf (5.339Mb)
Pidgeon2015.docx (17.02Mb)
Date
30/06/2015Item status
Restricted AccessEmbargo end date
31/12/2100Author
Pidgeon, Laura Marie
Metadata
Abstract
Many items encoded into episodic memory are highly similar – seeing a stranger’s car may
result in a memory representation which overlaps in many features with the memory of your
friend’s car. To avoid falsely recognising the novel but similar car, it is important for the
representations to be distinguished in memory. Even in healthy young adults failures of this
mnemonic discrimination lead relatively often to false recognition, and such errors become
substantially more frequent in older age. Whether an item’s representation is discriminated
from similar memory representations depends critically on how it is encoded. However, the
precise encoding mechanisms involved remain poorly understood. Establishing the
determinants of successful mnemonic discrimination is essential for future research into
strategies or interventions to prevent recognition errors, particularly in the context of age-related
decline. A fuller understanding of age-related decline in mnemonic discrimination
can also inform basic models of memory. This thesis evaluated the contribution of encoding
processes to mnemonic discrimination both in young adults and in ageing, within the
framework of two prominent accounts of recognition memory, the pattern separation account
(Wilson et al., 2006) and Fuzzy Trace Theory (FTT; Brainerd & Reyna, 2002). Firstly, a
functional magnetic resonance imaging study in young adults found evidence for differences
in regions engaged at encoding of images according to the accuracy of later mnemonic
discrimination, consistent with both pattern separation and FTT. Evidence of functional
overlap between regions showing activity consistent with pattern separation, and activity
associated with later accurate recognition was consistent with a role of cortical pattern
separation in successful encoding, but there was no direct evidence that cortical pattern
separation contributed to mnemonic discrimination. This first evidence of cortical pattern
separation in humans was supported by findings that in the majority of pattern separation
regions, response functions to stimuli varied in their similarity to previous items were
consistent with predictions of computational models. Regional variation in the dimension(s)
of similarity (conceptual/perceptual) driving pattern separation was indicative of variation in
the type of mnemonic interference minimised by cortical pattern separation. Further
evidence of encoding contributions to mnemonic discrimination was provided by an event-related
potential study in young and older adults. Older adults showed less distinct
waveforms than young adults at encoding of items whose similar lures were later correctly
rejected compared to those falsely recognised, supporting the proposal that age-related
encoding impairments contribute to the decline in mnemonic discrimination. Finally, a set of
behavioural studies found that older adults’ mnemonic discrimination deficit is increased by
conceptual similarity, supporting previous findings and consistent with FTT’s account of
greater emphasis by older adults on gist processing. However, older adults required greater
reduction in perceptual or conceptual similarity in order to successfully reject lures, as
uniquely predicted by the pattern separation account. Together, the findings support the
notion that encoding processes contribute directly to mnemonic discrimination and its age-related
decline. An integrated view of the pattern separation account and FTT is discussed
and developed in relation to the current findings.