Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLi, Xiaolong
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Di
dc.contributor.authorLi, Pengchun
dc.contributor.authorWu, Yingyuan
dc.contributor.authorLI, Xioachun
dc.contributor.authorWei, Ning
dc.contributor.authorHaszeldine, R Stuart
dc.contributor.authorSenior, Bill
dc.contributor.authorShu, Yutong
dc.contributor.authorLi, Jia
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yi
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-05T13:39:41Z
dc.date.available2016-04-05T13:39:41Z
dc.date.issued18/05/2015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1842/15767
dc.descriptionIn order to find CO2 storage site for the first full-chain offshore CCUS project in Guangdong Province, we examined 16 producing oil fields in the Pearl River Mouth Basin offshore Guangdong. At first, we eliminated from consideration the fields having good hydrocarbon potential that will not be depleted in the next 10 years. Then the CO2-EOR potential was analyzed based on simple comparison with West Texas and UK continental shelf. Finally the remaining fields were screened and ranked with a scoring table based on published data on production status, trap, reservoir and caprock geology, and potential for infrastructure reuse. On this basis three fields, the HZ21-1, HZ32-3, and XJ24-3 were selected as candidate sites. Their advantages and disadvantages or knowledge gaps for CO2 storage were discussed. Suggestions for further work to fulfil the knowledge gaps in order to make final selection were proposed.en
dc.description.abstractIn order to find CO2 storage site for the first full-chain offshore CCUS project in Guangdong Province, we examined 16 producing oil fields in the Pearl River Mouth Basin offshore Guangdong. At first, we eliminated from consideration the fields having good hydrocarbon potential that will not be depleted in the next 10 years. Then the CO2-EOR potential was analyzed based on simple comparison with West Texas and UK continental shelf. Finally the remaining fields were screened and ranked with a scoring table based on published data on production status, trap, reservoir and caprock geology, and potential for infrastructure reuse. On this basis three fields, the HZ21-1, HZ32-3, and XJ24-3 were selected as candidate sites. Their advantages and disadvantages or knowledge gaps for CO2 storage were discussed. Suggestions for further work to fulfil the knowledge gaps in order to make final selection were proposed.en
dc.contributor.sponsorBritish Consulate General in Guangzhouen
dc.contributor.sponsorDevelopment and Reform Commission of Guangdong Provinceen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUK-China (Guangdong) CCUS Centreen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesD01/2015en
dc.subjectCarbon Capture and Storageen
dc.subjectCCSen
dc.subjectcarbon capture utilisation and storageen
dc.subjectCCUSen
dc.subjectCO2-EORen
dc.subjectenhanced oil recoveryen
dc.subjectChinaen
dc.titleCO₂ Offshore Storage in China: Research Review and Plan for Demonstration Projecten
dc.typeTechnical Reporten


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record