Critical happiness: examining the beliefs that young Lao volunteers in Vientiane hold about the things that make life good.
View/ Open
McMellon2015.docx (673.2Kb)
Date
01/07/2015Author
McMellon, Christina Agnes
Metadata
Abstract
Happiness is consistently cited as one of the things that people consider most important in
their lives and yet is a slippery concept about which it is difficult to establish a shared
understanding. There is increasing agreement that Gross National Product (GDP) is not a
sufficient indicator of progress and that alternative measures may need to include the
subjective aspects of wellbeing, or happiness. However, if policy makers and development
workers are to seriously consider happiness, clarity is required about what it means to
different people and such clarity must be grounded in the everyday experiences of the
people whose lives social and development polices aim to improve.
Despite increasing interest in the concept of happiness within Laos, academic research
focusing upon positive subjective experience is limited. Young Lao people who volunteer
with Non-Profit Associations (NPAs) in Vientiane occupy a unique position at the
crossroads of a country that continues to be affected by a complex political legacy, a
rapidly modernising capital city and a newly visible civil society. The findings from the
current research provide rich data from 18 months of ethnographic and participative
fieldwork with this specific group of young people in Vientiane. The research addresses the
following questions:
What do the ways that young Lao volunteers in Vientiane express happiness tell us
about the ways that they conceptualise happiness?
What do young volunteers in Vientiane say makes them happy?
What beliefs do young volunteers in Vientiane have about happiness?
How do these beliefs about happiness fit with young volunteers’ expressed
experiences of happiness?
This thesis identifies three key conceptual models that research participants used to express
happiness including ‘Being Happy’ (happiness is a present moment choice), ‘Becoming
Happy’ (happiness is something to be achieved) and ‘Happy Being With Others’ (happiness
is located in relationships between people).
Further, three culturally constructed ‘happiness scripts’ that research participants share are
outlined and discussed. The three scripts are: “The way to be happy is to be a good Lao
person”, “I will be happy if I have the things that I need to be comfortable and to have an
easy life” and “I am happy when I follow my heart”. These scripts each combine a
conceptual mode of happiness with a focus on specific aspects of their lives that research
participants say make them happy and a set of shared beliefs about happiness. These three
scripts offer normative accounts of different pathways that research participants believe
will lead to happiness. The research demonstrates, however, how research participants hold
multiple scripts simultaneously and looks at the interactions and tensions between the
scripts and between the scripts and participants’ lived experiences.
The research concludes that the socially constructed nature of the happiness scripts and the
multiple conceptual models of happiness used by the research participants emphasise the
need for self-awareness and transparency in conversations about happiness. Any
consideration of happiness at policy level must include open and critical discussion about
the happiness script that is being promoted. At the individual level participants valued
positive opportunities to become aware of and challenge their own assumptions about the
things that are most important in their lives were beneficial to their happiness. The thesis,
therefore, recommends a shift in policy focus from solely measuring happiness to
promoting positive conversations about happiness at policy, community and individual
levels. Happiness is both an important experience and a slippery concept. It is both critical
that we consider it and vital that we remain critical of it.