dc.description.abstract | This thesis examines the idea of China in British literature during a clearly
defined period. Between 1757 and 1785, when Britain still had little direct contact
and cultural exchange with the Chinese, China evoked various attitudes, images and
beliefs in the British imagination. At times uncertain and evasive, popular
understandings of China were sufficiently malleable for writers of the period to
knead into domestic political satire and social discourse, giving fresh expression to
popular criticisms, philosophical aspirations, and religious tensions. The period
presents several prominent English, Irish, and Scottish writers who use the idea of
China precisely in this manner in writings as generically diverse as drama,
translation, travel writing, pseudo-Oriental letters, novels, and fairy tales. Some
invoke China’s supposed defects to accentuate Britain’s material, scientific, and
moral progress, or to feed contemporary debate about decadence in British society
and government. Others exploit the notion of a more civilized and virtuous China to
satirize what they regard as a supercilious cultural milieu attendant on their own
emerging polite and commercial society, or to interrogate their nation’s moral criteria
of the highest good, public-spiritedness, or evolving global enterprise. All give the
idea of China new currency in the dialectical interplay between literary appeals to
antiquity and the pursuit of modernity, enlisting it in philosophical and theological
debates of Enlightenment. This thesis will argue that its subject writers, including
Arthur Murphy, Thomas Percy, Oliver Goldsmith, John Bell, and Horace Walpole,
use the idea of China to help define a British identity as culturally and politically
distinct from Europe, especially France, and to contemplate Britain’s place within
global history and a broadening world view at mid-century. | en |