Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAdams, Andrew Ten
dc.date.accessioned2007-08-14T14:39:38Z
dc.date.available2007-08-14T14:39:38Z
dc.date.issued1996
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1842/1850
dc.description.abstractRisk assessment is a topical subject in the investment trust sector. Several fund management groups have started issuing risk gradings from their investment trusts. Money Management and Micropal now publish volatility figures and in March 1995, the Association of Investment Trust Companies issued a fact sheet on risk for private investors which proposed the use of volatility in the risk assessment of investment trusts. This paper develops a model which splits the variance of total returns to shareholders into three components. The relative importance of each of these components is then estimated for different time intervals using historical data. The results emphasise the importance of the investor's time horizon. This suggests that there should be separate management group risk gradings for private investors with different time horizons. For most investors, standard deviation of net asset value return is more appropriate measure of risk than volatility.en
dc.format.extent64331 bytesen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherManagement School and Economics. The University of Edinburghen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCFMRen
dc.relation.ispartofseries96.03en
dc.subjectEconomicsen
dc.titleComponents of Risk for Investment Trustsen
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record