Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWhite, Philen
dc.contributor.authorTerry, Nen
dc.date.accessioned2007-08-15T08:15:41Z
dc.date.available2007-08-15T08:15:41Z
dc.date.issued1997
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1842/1857
dc.description.abstractEmployers offer pension plans for two main reasons; paternalism and skills market competiveness. Recent changes in legislation and business practice have promoted the scrutiny of the underpinnings for such a management tradition. The paper identifies several relevant factors that derive from: field work undertaken by the authors; the Pension Act 1995; and recent changes to corporation tax. It is argued that what has emerged is a sharply focused tradeoff, relating to the asset and liability characteristics of employer-based pension schemes. This questions the sustainablilty of all types of pension plans and thereby has a place in strategies affecting financial planning and business development.en
dc.format.extent44554 bytesen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherManagement School and Economics. The University of Edinburghen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCFMRen
dc.relation.ispartofseries97.07en
dc.subjectEconomicsen
dc.titleWhen is a Promise a Strategic Liability?en
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record