dc.contributor.author | White, Phil | en |
dc.contributor.author | Terry, N | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-08-15T08:15:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-08-15T08:15:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1997 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1842/1857 | |
dc.description.abstract | Employers offer pension plans for two main reasons; paternalism and skills market competiveness. Recent changes in legislation and business practice have promoted the scrutiny of the underpinnings for such a management tradition. The paper identifies several relevant factors that derive from: field work undertaken by the authors; the Pension Act 1995; and recent changes to corporation tax. It is argued that what has emerged is a sharply focused tradeoff, relating to the asset and liability characteristics of employer-based pension schemes. This questions the sustainablilty of all types of pension plans and thereby has a place in strategies affecting financial planning and business development. | en |
dc.format.extent | 44554 bytes | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Management School and Economics. The University of Edinburgh | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | CFMR | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 97.07 | en |
dc.subject | Economics | en |
dc.title | When is a Promise a Strategic Liability? | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |