Edinburgh Research Archive logo

Edinburgh Research Archive

University of Edinburgh homecrest
View Item 
  •   ERA Home
  • Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, School of
  • Psychology
  • Psychology Undergraduate thesis collection
  • View Item
  •   ERA Home
  • Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, School of
  • Psychology
  • Psychology Undergraduate thesis collection
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Beauty in Architecture: Simply a Waste?

View/Open
McDonald O diss.pdf (239.0Kb)
Date
2007
Item status
Restricted Access
Author
McDonald, Orla
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
This study was an exploratory investigation of beauty in architecture, through which a theory of waste predicting beauty in buildings was developed. In a series of four experiments, it was shown firstly, through an experiment where a selection of University of Edinburgh buildings were rated for beauty, that buildings do differ significantly in their ratings of beauty, that functionality does not affect beauty ratings and that agreement exists between individuals on what is, and is not, attractive in architecture. After this, evolutionary theories of beauty, which cite waste as a crucial factor in creating beauty, such as peacock’s tails or birdsong, are applied to architecture. In this way it is predicted that buildings with a high waste value, observed through not maximising potential floor space or by incorporating excessive detail into the building design, will be rated as more attractive than those buildings which are less wasteful. This was investigated through a number of experiments. Firstly, when pictures from an architectural book were rated for waste by experimenters and then rated by participants for beauty, a significant positive correlation of 0.762 was found. After this an experiment was conducted in which 22 participants described their ideal house. By analysing the qualitative data recorded, it was possible to sort the descriptions into clusters. It was found that 19 of the participants described an extremely similar house and could be placed in one group, the remaining 3 descriptions were idiosyncratic in nature and so were kept separately. From the descriptions of the houses, ‘Google Sketchup’ drawings were created of the 4 houses. These were then rated on waste and beauty by 19 participants in the final of the four experiments. The hypothesis that waste ratings would influence beauty ratings was convincingly supported with a significant Pearson’s correlation of 0.857 and a R2 value of 0.739 found. The theory that waste determines beauty in architecture has therefore been supported.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2542
Collections
  • Psychology Undergraduate thesis collection

Library & University Collections HomeUniversity of Edinburgh Information Services Home
Privacy & Cookies | Takedown Policy | Accessibility | Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Contact
feed RSS Feeds

RSS Feed not available for this page

 

 

All of ERACommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication TypeSponsorSupervisorsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication TypeSponsorSupervisors
LoginRegister

Library & University Collections HomeUniversity of Edinburgh Information Services Home
Privacy & Cookies | Takedown Policy | Accessibility | Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Contact
feed RSS Feeds

RSS Feed not available for this page