Edinburgh Research Archive logo

Edinburgh Research Archive

University of Edinburgh homecrest
View Item 
  •   ERA Home
  • Edinburgh Medical School
  • Edinburgh Medical School thesis and dissertation collection
  • View Item
  •   ERA Home
  • Edinburgh Medical School
  • Edinburgh Medical School thesis and dissertation collection
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

REM sleep patterning and dream recall in convergers and divergers

View/Open
HolmesM_1977redux.pdf (34.30Mb)
Date
1977
Author
Holmes, Michael
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
 
 
This thesis investigates the hypothesis that convergent and divergent thinking reflect different defensive preferences - convergers inclining towards repression, divergers to intellectual modes of defence.
 
To test this claim, individuals' reactions to their own dreams - a rich source of threatening material, according to psychoanalytic theory - were investigated. Utilising all-night electrophysiological monitoring of sleep, recall following awakenings from REM (dream) sleep was contrasted for convergent and divergent groups. The convergers did prove poorer at recalling dream content, but only from those awakenings that, it had been postulated, might elicit threatening material. Convergers' recall of non-threatening material ('control' awakenings) actually proved slightly better than for their divergent counterparts. These findings were taken to support the view that convergers more typically resort to repressive defensive measures.
 
Comparing REM sleep between the two groups on undisturbed nights, divergers were found to spend more time nightly in this stage of sleep than convergers. In addition, the REM sleep of divergers was characterised by a much lower density of eye movements. A closer analysis revealed that divergers spent much more time in substantial episodes of REM sleep without eye movements.
 
This finding was taken to reflect a divergent preference for intellectual modes of defence, having previously speculated that, during these episodes without eye movements, secondary revision of threatening dream experience may occur. The lower density of eye movements discharged by divergers was also attributable, in part, to a tendency for convergers to spend more time in episodes of sustained eye movement activity. Moreover, convergers exhibited a longer first period of REM sleep than divergers (against the overall trend) and a shorter REM sleep latency - all of which suggest a greater need for REM sleep and, arguably, its psychological concomitant, dreaming. This pattern was seen as support for psychological compensation, convergers making up for less imaginative day-time experience with more immediate and more intense dreaming.
 
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/30274
Collections
  • Edinburgh Medical School thesis and dissertation collection

Library & University Collections HomeUniversity of Edinburgh Information Services Home
Privacy & Cookies | Takedown Policy | Accessibility | Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Contact
feed RSS Feeds

RSS Feed not available for this page

 

 

All of ERACommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication TypeSponsorSupervisorsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication TypeSponsorSupervisors
LoginRegister

Library & University Collections HomeUniversity of Edinburgh Information Services Home
Privacy & Cookies | Takedown Policy | Accessibility | Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Contact
feed RSS Feeds

RSS Feed not available for this page