dc.contributor.advisor | Harrison, Gareth | en |
dc.contributor.advisor | Jeffrey, Henry | en |
dc.contributor.author | Bucher, Ralf | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-07-06T14:21:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-07-06T14:21:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-07-04 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1842/31297 | |
dc.description.abstract | Tidal current and wave power, as emerging forms of renewable generation, represent
innovations that are confronted by significant technological and financial challenges.
Currently, the marine energy sector finds itself in a decisive transition phase having
developed full-scale technology demonstrators but still lacking proof of the concept in
a commercial project environment. After the decades-long development process with
larger than expected setbacks and delays, investors are discouraged because of high
capital requirements and the uncertainty of future revenues. Although ideas for
improving the investment climate can be found, there is a lack of well-founded
arguments and coordinated strategies to work towards a breakthrough in the marine
energy market.
The objective of this research is to provide stakeholder-specific prioritised strategy
options for de-risking the commercialisation of tidal current and wave power
technologies. A key principle applied is to integrate a wide knowledge spectrum
comprising the technology, policy and financing sectors and to compile the
information in a holistic and transparent manner. To gain a broad understanding of the
characteristics of presently ongoing marine energy activities and the correlated
strategic planning, a comprehensive survey was conducted. Based on this multidisciplinary
attempt, an all-encompassing appraisal was possible by avoiding over-concentration
on stakeholder-specific views or interests. System dynamics modelling
was employed to develop a series of cause-effect relationship diagrams of the key
interactions and correlations in the field.
It was revealed that the circular relationship between two major risks for array-scale
projects – reliability and funding – requires coordinated action to overcome. As
funding is necessary for improving system reliability (and vice-versa), showcasing
“array-scale success” was identified as the game-changing milestone towards
commercial generation. Furthermore, it was found that a number of comparably
competent manufacturing firms is required to implement major marine energy
projects. This would result from fostering a multi-company market breakthrough
concept, based on intensified knowledge sharing and trustful collaborative interaction
between competitors.
Additionally, effective separation of complexity into “detail” and “dynamically
complex” constituents was found to be fundamental for identifying long-term,
effective solutions. It is decisive to accept this primary classification, as measures
appropriately applied on one type of complexity can be counterproductive if applied
on the other. Most of the available planning tools and analytical methods do not
address the management of dynamic complexity, necessary in innovative
environments where flexibility and tolerance of vagueness are indispensable.
Successful application of several strategies to deal with both types of complexity in
comparable innovation-driven environments was considered suitable for de-risking the
commercialisation of marine energy.
The challenges for strategy-finding in a demandingly complex and increasingly
dynamic environment are addressed in this research by exploiting a case-specific
expert knowledge database. The structured information compression and subsequent
strategy-finding process is realised based on calculated rankings of impact factors by
systems dynamics software and substantiated by representative interview statements.
The analysis makes use of multi-level expert knowledge and the application of a
control-loop-based methods. The systems approach as applied in this research
comprises the combination of interview-based (bottom-up learning) processes and the
application of prioritised strategy options in the form of concerted management action
(top-down planning).
The approach of processing multi-level interview data by system dynamics modelling
represents a powerful method to detect and assess ongoing developments and thus to
advance strategy-finding. The systematic and unbiased approach to identify the top-level
drivers for commercialising marine energy supports the long-term creation of
investor confidence, based on a concept of transparency and credibility. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | The University of Edinburgh | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Bucher, R., Jeffrey, H., Bryden, I.G., Harrison, G.P. (2016) Creation of investor confidence: The top-level drivers for reaching maturity in marine energy, Renewable Energy 88, pp120–129, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.renene. 2015.11.033 | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Bucher, R., Bryden, I.G. (2016) Overcoming the marine energy pre-profit phase: What classifies the game-changing “array-scale success”?, International Journal of Marine Energy, International Journal of Marine Energy, Vol. 13, pp180–192, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijome.2015.05.002 | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Bucher, R., Bryden, I.G. (2015) Governing the market entry of marine energy by symptom-adapted interventions: (i) Reduction of detail complexity; and (ii) Managing dynamically complex tasks, Journal of Energy Challenges and Mechanics, Vol. 2(2) article 4, pp56–61, ISSN 2056-9386 | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Bucher, R., Bryden, I.G. (2014a) Strategic orientation for the ocean energy market roll-out: Coherent technology learning by system dynamics modelling of trans-organisational expert knowledge, Journal of Energy Challenges and Mechanics, Vol. 1(2) article 8, pp103–112, ISSN 2056-9386 | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Bucher, R., Couch, S.J. (2013) Adjusting the financial risk of tidal current projects by optimising the “installed capacity/capacity factor” - ratio already during the feasibility stage, International Journal of Marine Energy, Vol. 2, pp24– 42, ISSN 2214-1669, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijome.2013.05.008 | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Bucher, R. (2012) De-risking marine energy investments by extending the regular project implementation by a competitive technology qualification routine, 4th International Conference on Ocean Energy (ICOE), Ireland | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Bucher, R., Jeffrey, H. (2015) The strategic objective of competitive collaboration: Managing the solid market launch of marine energy, 11th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference (EWTEC), Nantes, France | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Bucher, R., Jeffrey, H. (2014) Creation of investor confidence: The top-level drivers for reaching maturity, 5th International Conference on Ocean Energy (ICOE), Halifax, Canada | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Bucher, R., Bryden, I.G. (2014) Overcoming the marine energy pre-profit phase: What classifies the game-changing “array-scale success”?, 2nd Asian Wave and Tidal Energy Conference (AWTEC), Tokyo, Japan | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Bucher, R. (2013) Strategic risk management in ocean energy: A system dynamics approach to the evaluation of 40+ expert interviews, 10th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference (EWTEC), Aalborg, Denmark | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Bucher, R. (2012) De-risking marine energy investments by extending the regular project implementation by a competitive technology qualification routine, 4th International Conference on Ocean Energy (ICOE), Ireland | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Bucher, R., Couch S.J. (2011) Adjusting the financial risk of tidal current projects by optimising the “installed capacity / capacity factor” - ratio, 9th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference (EWTEC), Southampton, UK | en |
dc.subject | marine energy commercialisation | en |
dc.subject | strategic drivers | en |
dc.subject | investor confidence | en |
dc.subject | system dynamics modelling | en |
dc.subject | dynamic complexity | en |
dc.title | Strategic risk management for tidal current and wave power projects | en |
dc.type | Thesis or Dissertation | en |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en |
dc.type.qualificationname | PhD Doctor of Philosophy | en |