Plato and the poets: epistemological, ethical and ontological arguments in the Dialogues
Abstract
The thesis focuses on Plato’s treatment of poetry in the Ion, Gorgias and Republic
X. Although these discussions provide three quite different accounts of poets and
their activity and have thus commonly not been associated, a similar objective may
be detected in them: they all aim to disqualify poets, presenting them as
incompetent in what they do or also (in the Gorgias and Republic X) as morally
harmful. My aim is first to show how the three discussions differ from Plato’s
other major discussions of poetry in Republic II-III and Laws II and VII: while the
former provide (disqualifying) answers to the descriptive questions of whether
poets have relevant knowledge and how they morally affect their public, the latter
are concerned with the prescriptive questions of what poets should do in their
envisaged role as political instruments (Chapter I).
In the close study of the three discussions, my aim is to identify, critically examine
and compare the ‘disqualifying’ strategies employed in them: I consider, on the
one hand, how they substantiate the charges of poets’ incompetence or moral
harmfulness and on the other hand, how they counter and account for the widely
shared appreciation of Homer and other poets (Chapters II-V). Before discussing
Republic X, however, I consider separately the notion of poets’ μίμησις
(representation/ imitation), which in Republic X has a prominent role, but at the
same time appears difficult to understand in itself as well as seemingly inconsistent
with Plato’s other arguments about poets’ μίμησις, in particular in Republic III.
Rejecting the widely accepted assumption of ‘narrower’ and ‘wider’ meanings of
the term μίμησις respectively in Books III and X of the Republic, I analyse the
notion of μίμησις in itself, and, following this I distinguish between three kinds of
poets’ μίμησις and define in what elements they differ (Chapter IV). In the final
overview of the three discussions, I reconsider how successful are their
disqualifying depictions of poets.