dc.contributor.author | Skemp, J. B. | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-15T14:22:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-02-15T14:22:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1937 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1842/33975 | |
dc.description.abstract | | en |
dc.description.abstract | The present dissertation is a revision, made in the
light of works published during 1936 and the present year,
of an earlier dissertation compiled at Edinburgh under the
supervision and encouragement of Professor A. E. 'Taylor between
1934 and 1936 and submitted to the writer's College in
the Autumn of 1936 in connection with the election to Unofficial
Fellowships. | en |
dc.description.abstract | In revising the writer has not always modified phrases
suited only to the more intimate discussion permissible in
submitting work to his own college, nor has he abandoned altogether
the dogmatic tone of the judgments made therein. He
trusts that this dogmatism will be recognised as an attempt to
reach a unified, 'synoptic' position, not as gratuitous cavil
against the work of great scholars. His debt to Professor
Taylor will be everywhere apparent. | en |
dc.description.abstract | The work necessarily shares the advantages and the dis-
advantages of recent Cambridge work in the realm of ancient
philosophy, the advantage of insisting on viewing ancient
thought as bound inseparably to ancient life, the disadvantage
(in the case of the present writer at any rate) of blank ignorance
of or insufficient acquaintance with the later history of
the metaphysical systems elaborated. In the case of Plato the
writer is bold enough to suggest that there may be gain rather
than loss in this. | en |
dc.publisher | The University of Edinburgh | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Annexe Thesis Digitisation Project 2019 Block 22 | en |
dc.relation.isreferencedby | | en |
dc.title | Plato's later philosophy of motion | en |
dc.type | Thesis or Dissertation | en |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en |
dc.type.qualificationname | PhD Doctor of Philosophy | en |