Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBlair, Leoen
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-15T14:31:15Z
dc.date.available2019-02-15T14:31:15Z
dc.date.issued1959
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1842/34786
dc.description.abstracten
dc.description.abstractThe main conclusions of this survey may he briefly re-stated thus: first, restrictions on conduct appear in a wide range of employment, public and private, and the justification for these is the public interest, ascertainable by reference to the duties involved; second, there seem to be no valid reasons, legal or political, why the government employee should be denied rights against the government as his employer, enforceable either in the ordinary courts or otherwise; and finally, there are strong grounds for asserting' that government employment is not, as such, sui generis and invariably subject to fundamentally different considerations from those arising in private employment.en
dc.publisherThe University of Edinburghen
dc.relation.ispartofAnnexe Thesis Digitisation Project 2019 Block 22en
dc.relation.isreferencedbyen
dc.titleThe legal status of the government employee: a comparitive studyen
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record