Edinburgh Research Archive logo

Edinburgh Research Archive

University of Edinburgh homecrest
View Item 
  •   ERA Home
  • Health in Social Science, School of
  • Health in Social Science thesis collection
  • View Item
  •   ERA Home
  • Health in Social Science, School of
  • Health in Social Science thesis collection
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Telling it like it is: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of multiple family group intervention for young people at risk of reoffending

View/Open
MetcalfC_2005redux.pdf (21.68Mb)
Date
2005
Author
Metcalfe, Charlotte
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
 
 
Interventions aimed at reducing youth offending have tended to focus on either parents/carers or young people. In recent years, literature has highlighted the impact ofthe family on the emergence of offending behaviour in adolescence (Loeber & Stouthamer-Loeber, 1987). Evidence suggests that family interventions can be more effective but harder to implement successfully (Fadden, 1997). Research has indicated that working with both young people and their parents within a multiple family group (MFG) setting may be more effective for 'hard to reach' groups (McKay, etal., 1995).
 
In the present study, a qualitative methodology was used to explore the experiences of five families and two facilitators who had attended a multiple family group (MFG) for young people at risk ofreoffending. Semi-stuctured interviews were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). The aim was to provide an in-depth account of the way in which these individuals made sense ofthe group process and the impact they perceived it to have on their wider lives.
 
Six super-ordinate themes were identified. The first related to the struggles families were experiencing prior to the MFG and the way in which this impacted on their ability to access services. The second related to participants' negative expectations of MFG intervention, largely based on previous experience ofprofessional input. The third concerned participants' overall positive perceptions oftheir involvement in the MFG. The fourth theme related to significant characteristics ofthe MFG that were thought to facilitate engagement. These were characterised in terms of a group 'ethos'. The fifth theme encompassed the overall impact that participants felt the MFG had on their own lives. The final theme related to the limitations ofthe MFG intervention
 
Overall, families responded well to MFG intervention and found it to have a positive impact in terms of their relationships with one another. This study has highlighted some of the critical factors that result in these families being labelled as 'hard to reach' and has identified some elements within service provision that may encourage them to engage. The need to offer a follow-up service was also identified.
 
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/35315
Collections
  • Health in Social Science thesis collection

Library & University Collections HomeUniversity of Edinburgh Information Services Home
Privacy & Cookies | Takedown Policy | Accessibility | Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Contact
feed RSS Feeds

RSS Feed not available for this page

 

 

All of ERACommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication TypeSponsorSupervisorsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication TypeSponsorSupervisors
LoginRegister

Library & University Collections HomeUniversity of Edinburgh Information Services Home
Privacy & Cookies | Takedown Policy | Accessibility | Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Contact
feed RSS Feeds

RSS Feed not available for this page