Edinburgh Research Archive logo

Edinburgh Research Archive

University of Edinburgh homecrest
View Item 
  •   ERA Home
  • Biological Sciences, School of
  • Biological Sciences thesis and dissertation collection
  • View Item
  •   ERA Home
  • Biological Sciences, School of
  • Biological Sciences thesis and dissertation collection
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Ant-pollinator interactions in Turnera velutina: ecological costs and evolutionary consequences for the ant-plant pollination

View/Open
Villamil-Buenrostro2019.pdf (3.392Mb)
Date
06/07/2019
Author
Villamil-Buenrostro, Nora
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Ant-plants recruit ants to defend them against herbivores, but most of them also require pollinator for successful seed set. Interactions between patrolling ants and pollinators on ant-plants have received relatively little attention. Negative ant-pollinator interactions are expected for several reasons. First, ants and pollinators benefit from plant investment in different functions (defence and reproduction, respectively) which can lead to plant trade-offs. Second, although more aggressive ants are likely to be better defenders, they may also deter pollinators, affecting plant fitness. However, ant-plants may have mechanisms to manage ant-pollinator interactions, maximising the benefits from their services whilst minimising the costs. I used field experiments to investigate the ecological costs and evolutionary consequences of ant patrolling for the pollination biology of a facultative ant-plant, the Mexican endemic Turnera velutina (Passifloraceae), addressing the following questions: a) Which are the most aggressive and best ant defenders of T. velutina? b) Is there direct (pollinator deterrence) or indirect (nectar trade-offs) ant-pollinator conflict? c) What are the ecological costs and evolutionary consequences of myrmecophily for the host plant pollination and mating system? d) Do ant-plants have adaptations to cope with both mutualists, avoiding conflict? Answers: a) Cephalotes sp. ants was detected as parasitic non-defenders, and the remaining ant species were ranked as: Capmponotus planatus < Crematogaster sp. < Paratrechina longicornis < Brachymyrmex sp. < Dorymyrmex bicolor. b) I found evidence for direct but not for indirect conflict. c) Ant patrolling affected pollinator visit duration, pollen loads, out-crossing rates, and male fitness, leading to negative effects on pollinator foraging efficiency, but such changes had positive effects for plant fitness increasing outcrossing and male fitness. d) Extrafloral nectar also serves to bribe ants away from reproductive structures during the crucial pollination period, reducing the probability of ant-occupation of flowers, reducing ant-pollinator conflict, and increasing plant reproductive success.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/35583
Collections
  • Biological Sciences thesis and dissertation collection

Library & University Collections HomeUniversity of Edinburgh Information Services Home
Privacy & Cookies | Takedown Policy | Accessibility | Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Contact
feed RSS Feeds

RSS Feed not available for this page

 

 

All of ERACommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication TypeSponsorSupervisorsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication TypeSponsorSupervisors
LoginRegister

Library & University Collections HomeUniversity of Edinburgh Information Services Home
Privacy & Cookies | Takedown Policy | Accessibility | Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Contact
feed RSS Feeds

RSS Feed not available for this page