Ant-pollinator interactions in Turnera velutina: ecological costs and evolutionary consequences for the ant-plant pollination
View/ Open
Date
06/07/2019Author
Villamil-Buenrostro, Nora
Metadata
Abstract
Ant-plants recruit ants to defend them against herbivores, but most of them also
require pollinator for successful seed set. Interactions between patrolling ants
and pollinators on ant-plants have received relatively little attention. Negative ant-pollinator
interactions are expected for several reasons. First, ants and pollinators
benefit from plant investment in different functions (defence and reproduction,
respectively) which can lead to plant trade-offs. Second, although more aggressive
ants are likely to be better defenders, they may also deter pollinators, affecting
plant fitness. However, ant-plants may have mechanisms to manage ant-pollinator
interactions, maximising the benefits from their services whilst minimising the
costs.
I used field experiments to investigate the ecological costs and evolutionary
consequences of ant patrolling for the pollination biology of a facultative ant-plant,
the Mexican endemic Turnera velutina (Passifloraceae), addressing the following
questions:
a) Which are the most aggressive and best ant defenders of T. velutina?
b) Is there direct (pollinator deterrence) or indirect (nectar trade-offs) ant-pollinator
conflict?
c) What are the ecological costs and evolutionary consequences
of myrmecophily for the host plant pollination and mating system?
d) Do ant-plants have adaptations to cope with both mutualists, avoiding
conflict?
Answers:
a) Cephalotes sp. ants was detected as parasitic non-defenders, and the
remaining ant species were ranked as: Capmponotus planatus <
Crematogaster sp. < Paratrechina longicornis < Brachymyrmex sp. <
Dorymyrmex bicolor.
b) I found evidence for direct but not for indirect conflict.
c) Ant patrolling affected pollinator visit duration, pollen loads, out-crossing
rates, and male fitness, leading to negative effects on pollinator foraging
efficiency, but such changes had positive effects for plant fitness increasing
outcrossing and male fitness.
d) Extrafloral nectar also serves to bribe ants away from reproductive
structures during the crucial pollination period, reducing the probability of
ant-occupation of flowers, reducing ant-pollinator conflict, and increasing
plant reproductive success.