Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorNic Shuibhne, Niamh
dc.contributor.advisorLock, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorHancox, Emily Victoria
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T13:15:26Z
dc.date.available2019-07-10T13:15:26Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-09
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1842/35722
dc.description.abstractIn this thesis I draw attention to ‘overlapping norms’ as a distinct feature of EU law, show why EU lawyers should be concerned about how they inter-relate, and make the case for clearly articulated and consistently applied principles that govern their interrelationship. Norm overlap occurs when more than one norm could apply in a particular case and each of those norms is a variation on the same basic right, command, prescription or permission. As this thesis shows, norm overlap is prevalent in EU law as a result of three main factors: the highly substantive content of the Treaties, the close relationship between unwritten general principles of Union law and written sources of EU law, and the quality of legislative drafting. Despite the frequent occurrence of norm overlap in EU law, its existence has gone largely unacknowledged in legal scholarship. Similarly, so have the constitutional consequences that stem from how the ECJ determines the interrelationship between overlapping norms. Through a series of case studies, linked by the EU’s commitment to protection against discrimination, I examine how the ECJ determines questions of priority between overlapping norms. Specifically, I test the role of basic priority principles – such as respect for express clauses and the principles of lex superior, lex posterior and lex specialis – in determining the inter-relationship between norms. Although under-discussed in the case law of the ECJ and EU legal scholarship, these priority principles provide a useful starting point against which to compare ECJ practice. Extensive doctrinal research leads to two important findings. First, the ECJ usually applies existing priority principles to determine the inter-relationship between overlapping norms, even though it does not tend to refer to these principles explicitly. Secondly, when the ECJ does depart from these priority principles, it is usually without proper justification and often negatively impacts upon legal certainty, institutional balance, the balance of powers between the EU and the Member States, and rights protection.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherThe University of Edinburghen
dc.subjectoverlapping normsen
dc.subjectEU lawen
dc.subjectsubstantive content of Treatiesen
dc.subjectgeneral principles of Union lawen
dc.subjectwritten sources of EU lawen
dc.subjectlegislative drafting qualityen
dc.subjectECJen
dc.subjectpriority principlesen
dc.titleOverlapping norms in the EU legal orderen
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen
dc.rights.embargodate2020-07-09en
dcterms.accessRightsRestricted Accessen


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record