Edinburgh Research Archive logo

Edinburgh Research Archive

University of Edinburgh homecrest
View Item 
  •   ERA Home
  • History, Classics and Archaeology, School of
  • Archaeology thesis and dissertation collection
  • View Item
  •   ERA Home
  • History, Classics and Archaeology, School of
  • Archaeology thesis and dissertation collection
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Identifying the disappeared: testing a novel method for sorting commingled human remains

View/Open
Karell2019.pdf (29.29Mb)
Date
29/11/2019
Embargo end date
29/11/2020
Author
Karell, Mara Asher
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Individualisation of commingled remains is the first step towards identification of skeletal remains, and thus to returning a loved one to their family or community after tragedy and to providing closure. Currently, there are limited methods of individualisation of commingled remains, which hinders the identification process. This dissertation explored the effectiveness of a novel individualisation technique, called mesh-to-mesh value comparison (MVC), on pair-matching four different sets of bones: humeri, clavicles, temporal bones and calcanei. This was done using two different MVC methods: one manual which uses the program Flexscan3D, and the other automatic which uses the program Viewbox. Both use three-dimensional models of bones to more accurately digitally match pairs using Iterative Closest Point algorithms. The resulting data from both programs were assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values rates, calculated in two different manners: by Lowest Common Value selection and by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Results varied by bone type and MVC type but generally both MVC methods were highly accurate at pair-matching, though the manual always outperformed the automatic. The single exception for both the manual and automatic MVC methods was the clavicle set, which produced significantly lower results.
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1842/36642
Collections
  • Archaeology thesis and dissertation collection

Library & University Collections HomeUniversity of Edinburgh Information Services Home
Privacy & Cookies | Takedown Policy | Accessibility | Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Contact
feed RSS Feeds

RSS Feed not available for this page

 

 

All of ERACommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication TypeSponsorSupervisorsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication TypeSponsorSupervisors
LoginRegister

Library & University Collections HomeUniversity of Edinburgh Information Services Home
Privacy & Cookies | Takedown Policy | Accessibility | Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Contact
feed RSS Feeds

RSS Feed not available for this page