Edinburgh Research Archive logo

Edinburgh Research Archive

University of Edinburgh homecrest
View Item 
  •   ERA Home
  • Social and Political Sciences, School of
  • Politics
  • Politics thesis and dissertation collection
  • View Item
  •   ERA Home
  • Social and Political Sciences, School of
  • Politics
  • Politics thesis and dissertation collection
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Rolling changes in Russian foreign policy: divergent reactions to upheavals in the post-Soviet space and national role conceptions

View/Open
Strycharz2020.pdf (1.980Mb)
Date
30/11/2020
Item status
Restricted Access
Embargo end date
30/11/2021
Author
Strycharz, Damian
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Despite the increased interest in the analysis of Russian foreign policy (RFP), current approaches leave much unexplained. Many existing studies use either macro-theoretical approaches or are very empirical. Furthermore, discussions about Russia’s international behaviour are often politicised and largely normative. In order to address these gaps the project uses the role theoretical approach which focuses on leaders’ perceptions and the interactions between internal and external factors. Empirically, it examines Russia’s reactions to the 2003-4 colour revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine, the 2008 Five-Day War and the Euromaidan revolution. The thesis argues that divergent reactions to these crises result from a profound change in the leadership perceptions of Russia’s international duties. Consequently, a shift in dominant national role conceptions from Western partner to the defender of Russian compatriots resulted in more assertive foreign policy behaviour exemplified by the intervention in South Ossetia and the annexation of Crimea. The research argues that RFP remains largely pragmatic and that foreign policy-making processes in Russia are more complex and include more actors than commonly assumed. It also contributes to role theory, by linking the concepts of strategic use of roles and role change, and analysing contestation processes in a (semi-)authoritarian state. Consequently, it broadens the understanding of foreign policy formation in non-democracies.
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1842/37461

http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/746
Collections
  • Politics thesis and dissertation collection

Library & University Collections HomeUniversity of Edinburgh Information Services Home
Privacy & Cookies | Takedown Policy | Accessibility | Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Contact
feed RSS Feeds

RSS Feed not available for this page

 

 

All of ERACommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication TypeSponsorSupervisorsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication TypeSponsorSupervisors
LoginRegister

Library & University Collections HomeUniversity of Edinburgh Information Services Home
Privacy & Cookies | Takedown Policy | Accessibility | Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Contact
feed RSS Feeds

RSS Feed not available for this page