Identifying risk and protective factors in conditional release/discharge using systematic review and exploring lived experiences of compulsion and restriction orders using interpretative phenomenological analysis: a portfolio thesis in forensic mental health
View/ Open
Barnett2020.pdf (1.524Mb)
Date
30/11/2020Item status
Restricted AccessEmbargo end date
30/11/2021Author
Barnett, Vivienne
Metadata
Abstract
Compulsory treatment presents an ethical quandary and thus far research provides little
promise regarding reduced readmission or length of inpatient stays, though some value has
been shown in administering outpatient treatment. Those in forensic services and particularly
those under restriction orders face the greatest constraints on their liberty with detention
imposed “without limit of time”, unlike time-limited sentences in the prison system. There is a
dearth of research exploring patients perspectives of compulsory treatment and particularly
the most restrictive forms of this. The current study used interpretative phenomenological
analysis to analyse interviews with participants about their experiences of living under
restriction. Results derived four superordinate themes; (1) How did I end up here? (2) Impact:
Power, Punishment and Protection (3) Surviving and Adapting (4) Healing. The results are
reviewed in the context of extant findings; clinical implications and areas of future research are
discussed.
Conditional release (CR) is the primary mechanism for managing individuals under forensic
care in the community. Services must identify those at higher risk for revocation/ readmission
(RR) and promote protective factors for increased quality of life and to minimize recidivism. A
systematic search was conducted to identify, summarise and critically assess studies that have
evaluated factors associated with RR in forensic patients. The review found that higher
substance use, personality disorder/ traits, severity and chronicity in psychiatric illness,
criminality and minority ethnicity are risk factors for RR. Protective factors identified were: white
ethnicity, being married, social security, not having personality disorder, longer tenure in
outpatient programme, clozapine treatment, fewer incidents while on CR, labour skills and
higher functioning at CR. Future research should include prospective study designs,
standardised measures, and variables independent from RR. Clinical implications include
identification of individuals with risk factors for RR and promotion of protective factors.