Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGalasso, Carmine
dc.contributor.authorMcCloskey, John
dc.contributor.authorPelling, Mark
dc.contributor.authorHope, Max
dc.contributor.authorBean, Chris
dc.contributor.authorCremen, Gemma
dc.contributor.authorGuragain, Ramesh
dc.contributor.authorHancilar, Ufuk
dc.contributor.authorMenoscal, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorMwelu, Keziah
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, Jerry
dc.contributor.authorRush, David
dc.contributor.authorSinclair, Hugh
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-21T14:43:11Z
dc.date.available2021-06-21T14:43:11Z
dc.date.issued2021-04
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1842/37717
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/994
dc.description.abstractThe Sendai Framework for DRR 2015–2030 identifies an urgent need for a global effort by researchers, practitioners, and governments to integrate science with action to support risk-sensitive decision making . Tomorrow's Cities aims to co-produce methodologies and guidelines for this action-oriented, pro-poor, multi-hazard risk-based decision-making agenda. Understanding and acting on risk is complex. Risk assessments are necessarily based on significant simplifications of the underlying physical and social processes, they are difficult to validate, and the reporting process often obscures caveats implicit in underlying assumptions. Technical outputs may have an inappropriate impact due to inaccurate expectations and limited comprehension). Experience also shows that state-of-the-art risk modelling on its own is not sufficient to build risk reduction into development planning and to support a movement to pro-poor, resilient actions. Institutional inertia, exclusive decision-making structures, and competing interests can mean even the best new knowledge is used only to enhance existing policy and practice. This means that risk science has to be built on the best current methods and must also understand the development context within which risk and resilience are positioned by competing actors in a city. It must then be used to convene policy and practical spaces for new coalitions of interest to cohere and bring pro-poor resilience into policy and action. This editorial outlines Tomorrow's Cities new approach to risk.en
dc.contributor.sponsorUKRI Global Challenges Research Funden
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Reductionen
dc.subjectRisken
dc.titleEditorial: Risk-based, Pro-poor Urban Design and Planning for Tomorrow's Citiesen
dc.typeArticleen
dcterms.publisherInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Reductionen


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record