dc.contributor.advisor | Heal, Mathew | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Drewer, Julia | |
dc.contributor.author | Purser, Gemma | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-22T12:10:24Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-22T12:10:24Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-11-27 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1842/38304 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/1570 | |
dc.description.abstract | The UK government has committed to a net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG)
emission target by 2050. Bioenergy technologies are a dominant feature in
the pathways to achieving this target. It is suggested that 0.7 million hectares
of land could be used for bioenergy crops by 2050. Planting fast-growing tree
species as short-rotation forest (SRF) or short-rotation coppice (SRC) is one
potential source of biomass. However, trees emit biogenic volatile organic
compounds (BVOCs) such as isoprene and monoterpenes, which are
important precursors in the formation of the atmospheric pollutants ozone
and secondary organic aerosols (SOA). Therefore extensive additional tree
planting may have implications for air quality.
In this thesis, BVOC emissions were measured from four tree species grown
in UK SRF and SRC plantations: hybrid aspen (Populus tremula L. x
tremuloides Michx.) and Italian alder (Alnus cordata Desf.) (broadleaf
deciduous trees), Eucalyptus gunnii (broadleaf evergreens) and a common
plantation species Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis, a conifer evergreen) were
selected. Emissions were quantified using a chamber method and off-line
thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. In
addition, a further five eucalypt species were assessed during a scoping
study of pot-grown young trees in outside conditions. Sitka spruce, although
not a species selected for development as SRF, is the dominant plantation
tree species within the UK and therefore served as a comparison. Field
measurements for BVOCs were made on foliage (branch scale) and from the
forest floor of SRF plantations to assess the contribution of these sources to
emissions from the plantation as a whole.
Mean isoprene emission rates were highest from hybrid aspen (22.8 μg gdw-1
h
-1
). In comparison, isoprene emissions from Sitka spruce (10.9 μg gdw-1 h
-1
)
and Eucalyptus gunnii (7.5 μg gdw-1 h
-1
) were around half that of aspen. Only
trace amounts of isoprene were emitted from Italian alder (0.03 μg gdw-1 h
-1
).
This ranking was almost the reverse for total monoterpene emissions, with
Sitka spruce (3.4 μg gdw-1 h
-1
) being the largest emitter, followed by
Eucalyptus gunnii (1.2 μg gdw-1 h
-1
), Italian alder (0.86 μg gdw-1 h
-1
) and hybrid
aspen (0.17 μg gdw-1 h
-1
).
BVOC emissions from a range of cold-tolerant eucalypt species (Eucalyptus
globulus subsp. bicostata, Eucalyptus subcrenulata, Eucalyptus pauciflora
subsp. debeuzevillei, Eucalyptus cordata subsp. quadrangulosa, Eucalyptus
Johnstoni) deemed suitable for the UK climate are also reported here for the
first time. The mean isoprene emissions of the young pot-grown trees ranged
between 1.3 μg gdw-1 h
-1 and 10 μg gdw-1 h
-1
, which means the UK-grown
eucalypts in this initial scoping study can be classified as ‘medium’ emitters
of isoprene, contrary to the ‘high’ (>10 μg gdw-1 h
-1
) emitter classification
suggested by previous studies. Emissions of total monoterpenes were an
order of magnitude smaller than the isoprene emissions in most cases.
The contribution of the forest floor to total forest BVOC emissions is often not
deemed significant and has in the past been overlooked for some forest
types. This work highlighted the changes in magnitude and the variation in
composition of the BVOC emissions. In the case of Eucalyptus gunnii, in
particular, monoterpene emissions change by an order of magnitude as a
result of the changes associated with the SRC management cycle. The
contribution of monoterpenes (and isoprene when measured) are presented
here for aspen, alder and Eucalyptus gunnii plantations for the first time. In
the evergreen plantations (Sitka spruce and Eucalyptus gunnii), where leaf
litter was present all year round, the monoterpene emissions peaked during
the summer months, reaching up to 70 μg m-2 h
-1 when temperatures were
high and soil moisture was low, although the drivers for forest floor emissions
under field conditions are complex. Total monoterpene emissions from the
forest floor in these plantations contributed a maximum of 10% compared to
canopy emissions. In the deciduous plantations (Italian alder and hybrid
aspen) contributions of monoterpenes from the forest floor were attributed to
leaf fall in the autumn or ground vegetation growth during the summer.
However, the BVOC emissions to the atmosphere from the forest floor still
remains a relatively minor source in comparison to the canopy.
Modelled emissions (MEGAN2.1) using measured leaf area index data and
two contrasting weather conditions for the UK (two consecutive years in
south and north UK) produced mean annual isoprene and total monoterpene
emissions for the four different tree types at the plantation scale. Isoprene
emissions from the two bioenergy SRF species, hybrid aspen (15.5 kg C ha 1
) and Italian alder (0.02 kg C ha-1
), and bioenergy SRC species Eucalyptus
gunnii (2.2 kg C ha-1
), may have BVOC emissions no larger than those of
commercial UK conifer forests of Sitka spruce (15.7 kg C ha-1
). Total
monoterpene emissions followed a similar pattern with emissions from Sitka
spruce being the largest.
A first assessment of the contribution of SRF and SRC bioenergy crops to
UK scale emissions was made based on the proposed expansion of
bioenergy crops (assuming all as SRF or SRC) to 0.7 Mha by 2050. The
relative percentage increase in UK BVOC emissions from this bioenergy
expansion ranged widely – between <1% up to 35% – both due to tree
species planted but also because of the wide variation in previous literature
estimates of existing UK BVOC emissions. UK-wide air quality simulations
carried out using the EMEP4UK atmospheric chemistry transport model for a
range of fairly extreme SRF planting scenarios of one of the 4 species
mentioned above showed annual average ozone increases of up to 7% in
some parts of the UK (particularly the south). On the other hand significant
benefits of planting these trees on atmospheric composition were also
observed with reductions of up to 11% in annual mean PM2.5 concentrations.
As well as further work on aspects of research described in this thesis,
further work is also required to understand other aspects of increased
planting of bioenergy forests on air quality such as from the emissions of
sesquiterpenes and pollen. | en |
dc.contributor.sponsor | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | The University of Edinburgh | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Purser, G., Drewer, J., Heal, M.R., Sircus, R.A.S., Dunn, L.K., Morison, J.I.L., 2021. Isoprene and monoterpene emissions from alder, aspen and spruce short rotation forest plantations in the UK. Biogeosciences. 2021, 18, p.2487- 2510,1–52. | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Purser, G., J. Drewer, J.I.L. Morison, and M.R. Heal, 2021. A first assessment of the sources of isoprene and monoterpene emissions from a short-rotation coppice Eucalyptus gunnii bioenergy plantation in the UK. Atmospheric Environment, p. 118617 | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Purser, G., Heal, M.R., White, S., Morison, J.I.L., Drewer, J., 2020. Differences in isoprene and monoterpene emissions from cold-tolerant eucalypt species grown in the UK. Atmospheric Pollution Research. 11, 2011–2021 | en |
dc.subject | bioenergy crops | en |
dc.subject | short-rotation forest | en |
dc.subject | biogenic volatile organic compounds | en |
dc.subject | BVOCs | en |
dc.subject | hybrid aspen | en |
dc.subject | Italian alder | en |
dc.subject | eucalyptus | en |
dc.subject | Sitka spruce | en |
dc.subject | BVOC emissions | en |
dc.subject | monoterpene measurement | en |
dc.subject | isoprene measurement | en |
dc.title | Bioenergy plantations: assessment of biogenic volatile organic compounds from short-rotation forests and their potential impact on UK air quality | en |
dc.type | Thesis or Dissertation | en |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en |
dc.type.qualificationname | PhD Doctor of Philosophy | en |