dc.contributor.advisor | Welburn, Julie | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Hardwick, Kevin | |
dc.contributor.author | Legal, Thibault | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-12T11:25:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-12T11:25:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-12-07 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1842/38403 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/1668 | |
dc.description.abstract | During mitosis, cells must ensure that chromosomes are correctly segregated to both
daughter cells. Chromosomes must attach microtubules from opposite spindle poles and
congress to the metaphase plate. Once all the chromosomes are bioriented, the cell proceeds
to anaphase and chromosomes migrate to opposite poles. Microtubules are dynamic
filaments that grow and shrink. It is essential that chromosomes maintain their attachment
to microtubules during mitosis to allow for correct chromosome segregation. Chromosomes
are attached to microtubules of the mitotic spindle via their kinetochore, a multiprotein
complex scaffold that assembles onto centromeric DNA.
First, I studied the molecular basis of outer kinetochore-microtubule attachments in the
budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. There, the Dam1 complex is an outer kinetochore-localised heterodecamer that maintains correct kinetochore attachment to a single incoming
microtubule in vivo. The organisation of the ten different subunits within a single complex
and how multiple complexes oligomerise is unclear. Furthermore, which domains of which
subunits are responsible for microtubule binding remains under debate. Using cross-linking
coupled with mass spectrometry, I shed light on the subunit organisation of Dam1
heterodecamers and obtained information on domains mediating oligomerisation. I
demonstrated that the flexible C termini of both Duo1 and Dam1 subunits were essential for
microtubule binding by designing mutants and assessing their microtubule-binding abilities.
This work shows Duo1 and Dam1 subunits are placed in close proximity to the microtubule
lattice and furthers our understanding of the overall structure of the Dam1 complex.
I then focussed on kinetochore-microtubule attachments in humans. In higher eukaryotes,
chromosomes align along the metaphase plate and biorient via different processes involving
motors and microtubules. Some are immediately captured by microtubules while others
move to the spindle poles before sliding from the poles to the metaphase plate, following
the lattice of a kinetochore fibre. CENP-E is a large kinesin motor essential for chromosome
congression. However, how CENP-E is recruited to unattached kinetochores remains poorly
defined. Using biochemistry and cell biology, I showed that a minimal kinetochore-targeting
domain of CENP-E interacts with the spindle checkpoint protein BubR1 directly in vitro and
that the C-terminal helix of the pseudokinase domain of BubR1 is essential but not sufficient
for CENP-E binding. Conversely, CENP-E necessitates a conserved acidic patch close to its C
terminus for BubR1 binding. This precise mapping of the interaction allowed us to interrogate
the role of BubR1 in recruiting CENP-E to kinetochores. We revealed that this interaction is
essential for CENP-E recruitment in early mitosis and in metaphase. These experiments also
highlight that CENP-E is recruited to kinetochores via another, uncharacterised, pathway.
This work led to the third aim of my thesis: identify an alternative recruitment pathway of
CENP-E to kinetochores. CENP-E localises to the outer corona of kinetochores. Interestingly,
CENP-E detaches from kinetochores after a short treatment with a CDK1 inhibitor. CENP-E is
then found in a protein complex that contains other detached corona proteins such as the
RZZ complex, the Dynein adaptor Spindly and Dynactin. I identified a minimal domain of
CENP-E that localises to these detachable structures and identified key residues essential for
this localisation. By designing mutants, I showed that the kinetochore-targeting domain of
CENP-E contains two kinetochore binding sites suggesting that two different pools of CENP-E are recruited to kinetochores. Finally, using siRNA, I showed that Dynein forms a second
recruitment pathway of CENP-E to kinetochores.
Overall, this work broadens the knowledge of kinetochore-microtubule attachment during
mitosis in both yeast and humans. It provides key information that will allow future structural
work on the Dam1 complex as well as future studies on the binding partners of CENP-E at
kinetochores. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | The University of Edinburgh | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Legal, T., Hayward, D., Gluszek-Kustusz, A., Blackburn, E. A., Spanos, C., Rappsilber, J., Gruneberg, U. and Welburn, J. P. I. (2020). The C-terminal helix of BubR1 is essential for CENP-E-dependent chromosome alignment. Journal of cell science | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Legal, T., Zou, J., Sochaj, A., Rappsilber, J. and Welburn, J. P. (2016). Molecular architecture of the Dam1 complex-microtubule interaction. Open Biol 6 | en |
dc.subject | mitosis | en |
dc.subject | microtubules | en |
dc.subject | Dam1 | en |
dc.subject | kinetochore-microtubule attachments | en |
dc.subject | CENP-E | en |
dc.subject | BubR1 | en |
dc.subject | spindle assembly checkpoint | en |
dc.subject | kinetochore-recruitment pathways | en |
dc.title | Molecular insights into kinetochore-microtubule attachments in mitosis | en |
dc.type | Thesis or Dissertation | en |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en |
dc.type.qualificationname | PhD Doctor of Philosophy | en |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2022-12-07 | en |
dcterms.accessRights | Restricted Access | en |