Relationship between attachment and adolescent depression: the role of emotion regulation and cultural context
Abstract
Adolescence marks an increased vulnerability to depression due to the
substantial physical, psychological, and social changes during this developmental
period. Considerable research has suggested that the development and
maintenance of adolescent depression can be shaped by early attachment
experiences. However, little is understood about its underlying mechanisms.
Given the inextricable link between emotion regulation (ER) and both
attachment and depression, the present research examined the role of cognitive
reappraisal, suppression, and rumination as potential mediating mechanisms
between attachment (anxiety and avoidance) and adolescent depression. As each
of these components is deeply embedded in cultural contexts, this research
further investigated whether and to what extent the relationship between
attachment, ER, and depression varies across cultures using a sample of
Vietnamese and British adolescents.
This research consisted of three studies that involved two independent samples:
one pilot study including young Vietnamese and British people aged 16-25
living in the UK (N= 182), and two empirical studies based on Vietnamese
and British adolescents aged 12-18 in secondary schools in Vietnam and
Scotland, respectively (N=1136). All studies were cross-sectional and used self-reported measures (either online or in person). Confirmatory factor analysis and
structural equation modelling were used to analyse the data.
The present research is the first to provide direct empirical evidence supporting
the hypothesis that each attachment dimension is linked to depression
via predominant ER strategies in adolescents. Analyses showed that while
cognitive reappraisal mediated only the link between avoidance and depression,
suppression and rumination mediated the link between both avoidance and
anxiety and depression. These associations also varied across parental and
peer relationships. Together, these results highlight the need to carefully
consider the role of specific relationship domains and attachment dimensions as
they potentially uniquely contribute to the mechanisms underlying adolescent
depression.
The cross-cultural comparison identified both similarities and differences in
the relationship between attachment, ER, and depression across cultures.
There was a consistent predictive power of peer attachment for depression
while the contribution of parental attachment was subjected to the cultural
contexts. Similarly, while cognitive reappraisal and rumination pathways showed
similar patterns, culture-specific associations were found for suppression. The
hypothesised model explained a larger proportion of depression variance in the
British sample (76%) compared to the Vietnamese sample (53%), indicating
that other cultural factors might also be at play. Such findings together directly
challenge the tendency to overlook cultural influence in existing attachment and
ER conceptualisations.
This research presents some exciting avenues for future studies, for example,
the adaptive components of peer avoidance, or the cultural factors explaining
the cross-cultural variations regarding parent attachment and suppression in
relation to depression. Current findings have important clinical implications for
the development and cross-cultural adaptions of existing attachment- and ER-based prevention and intervention programs to target depression in adolescents.