Edinburgh Research Archive logo

Edinburgh Research Archive

University of Edinburgh homecrest
View Item 
  •   ERA Home
  • Geosciences, School of
  • GeoSciences PhD thesis and dissertation collection
  • View Item
  •   ERA Home
  • Geosciences, School of
  • GeoSciences PhD thesis and dissertation collection
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

On primaries-only travel times construction using Marchenko redatuming

View/Open
DokterE_2022.pdf (83.13Mb)
Date
30/06/2022
Author
Dokter, Eva
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Extraction of primaries-only reflection data from full surface reflection data by a combina- tion of Marchenko redatuming and convolutional interferometry, incorporates artefacts, and noise following the constructed primaries. I have shown that the only true information recov- ered are primaries travel times, any dynamic information is artificial. I develop two extended versions of the original workflow, one of which processes seismic data throughout, avoids noise following the primary, and mitigates artefacts typical of this type of primaries construc- tion workflow. The other one uses travel time information as input and output, avoids noise following the primary, and also avoids artefacts by applying a quality control criterion dur- ing the convolutional interferometry step. It is cheaper and faster than the first version, and the resulting 2D primaries travel times matrices need less storage than seismograms. For complex data, it is difficult to extract a sufficient amount of kinematic information to gain an advantage over the full reflection data during velocity analysis and velocity model build- ing. The mechanics of the primaries construction workflow introduce a new class of artificial arrivals, which are indistinguishable from true arrivals. I have used imaging with the true model here to identify them. In addition, the bottom of a thin layer can be omitted in the final data, even if the primary reflection is present in the input data. I have used a horizon- tally layered subsurface model to show that mathematical convergence of the Marchenko redatuming scheme, as measured by the behaviour of convergence energy, is no guarantee for physical convergence towards the correct solution. Inverting for redatuming parameters using the trend of the convergence energy, or related measures applied to the same wave fields, can produce reliable looking results, but these are misleading and mostly false. Since the approach fails for a specific model, it is to be considered unreliable in general.
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1842/39252

http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/2503
Collections
  • GeoSciences PhD thesis and dissertation collection

Library & University Collections HomeUniversity of Edinburgh Information Services Home
Privacy & Cookies | Takedown Policy | Accessibility | Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Contact
feed RSS Feeds

RSS Feed not available for this page

 

 

All of ERACommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication TypeSponsorSupervisorsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication TypeSponsorSupervisors
LoginRegister

Library & University Collections HomeUniversity of Edinburgh Information Services Home
Privacy & Cookies | Takedown Policy | Accessibility | Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Contact
feed RSS Feeds

RSS Feed not available for this page