Negotiation and mobility in Early Modern Venice: Armenian, Jewish, and Ottoman Turkish merchants and the Cinque Savii alla Mercanzia, c.1541-1700
View/ Open
Prideaux2022.pdf (5.781Mb)
Date
15/11/2022Item status
Restricted AccessEmbargo end date
15/11/2023Author
Prideaux, Tamsin
Metadata
Abstract
This thesis provides a new analysis of negotiations between foreign merchants and Venice’s
board of trade, the Cinque Savii alla Mercanzia, during the sixteenth and seventeenth
centuries. In the last two decades, historians have paid increasing attention to mobility and
migration in the early modern Mediterranean, many emphasising the cultural fluidity of
individuals traversing imperial boundaries between the Venetian and Ottoman Empires.
Scholars have investigated how certain trans-imperial subjects also engaged in processes of
cultural mediation and boundary-making in these empires. However, scholars have not yet
fully understood the legal and bureaucratic structures in Venice which allowed this movement
between empires to occur. This study rectifies this discrepancy by uncovering how foreign
merchants manipulated and shaped Venetian legal processes to secure their presence and
importance in the city. The research is based on rich and numerous archival sources of
regulations, merchants’ petitions, letters, and architectural plans from the Venice State
Archive and the Museo Correr Library. The thesis pays particular attention to Armenian,
Jewish, and Ottoman Turkish merchants, in a broader comparison with German, Greek,
Netherlandish, and Safavid Persian merchants. By using a comparative approach, it illustrates
patterns and differences in how immigrant communities interacted with Venetian authorities,
thus addressing a significant gap in historical scholarship which has so far focussed on
individual immigrant groups.
Immigrant merchants negotiated with, and were regulated by, the Cinque Savii alla
Mercanzia. The Venetian Senate established this body in 1507 to encourage overseas trade,
which had been declining in Venice. By 1630 the Cinque Savii alla Mercanzia had become
the preeminent body dealing with international trade and regulated all immigrant mercantile
communities in Venice. The first part of this thesis establishes how the Cinque Savii alla
Mercanzia functioned in Venice’s corporate government bureaucracy. The fragmentary nature
of Venice’s governance meant that fierce jurisdictional rivalries existed between the multitude
of regulatory bodies. To survive this competition and prove their worth, the Cinque Savii
needed to encourage trade, which required them to appease the interests of immigrant
merchants. Chapters two and three examine how immigrants used two key tools of legal
negotiation - petitions and representatives - to establish their rights and privileges. During
these legal processes, immigrant merchants effectively transformed Venetian legal structures
from the inside and shaped Venetian economic policies towards mercantile migrants and
foreign trade. The final two chapters then analyse how the Cinque Savii alla Mercanzia
navigated conflicting concerns of piety and pragmatism in their regulation of immigrant
spaces and the ways in which immigrant merchants were able to circumvent restrictive
measures.
This thesis argues that Venice exhibited neither a consistent approach of economic
tolerance nor religious hostility to foreign merchants. Rather, economic, cultural, civic, and
moral concerns were inextricably linked in the regulation of trade and mobility. Furthermore,
this study shifts attention onto detailed negotiation; revealing that immigrant merchants
themselves applied pressure to transform the policies of the Venetian government. They
achieved this by exploiting the paradoxical position of the Cinque Savii alla Mercanzia as
both a representative of foreign merchants, and of Venetian authority. A thorough
investigation of Venetian government bureaucracy is integral to these findings and this thesis
presents the first in-depth analysis of the Cinque Savii alla Mercanzia magistracy in the last
century. An understanding of this body, and how political negotiation took place on an
everyday, micro-level basis, allows us to form a broader picture of the complex negotiations,
political priorities, and personal ambitions which sustained the movement of people, goods,
and ideas across the early modern Mediterranean.