dc.contributor.advisor | Cooper, Sarah | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Bunduchi, Raluca | |
dc.contributor.author | Ding, Thomas | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-24T12:50:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-24T12:50:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-01-24 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1842/39757 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/3005 | |
dc.description.abstract | Intended as a counterargument, this thesis evaluates the premise of several key arguments that
have been made against the opportunity construct. As a result, several issues were recognised and
distilled into a root problem of the favourability connotation that is commonly associated with an
opportunity. This problem was also traced back to the economic perspective on which the
opportunity construct was initially defined. To make a distinct contribution that supports the
opportunity construct, this thesis departs from the economic perspective and reconceptualises the
opportunity construct from a design perspective. To revisit how opportunities manifest, this thesis
draws on a combination of cross-sectional and longitudinal qualitative data from primary and
secondary sources. Overall, there are three important findings. First, this thesis introduces the
affordance language, which was found to enable the opportunity construct to overcome its
retrospective usage constraints. Second, the thesis offers a definition of opportunities when
deemed as emergent design artefacts, and an avenue to operationalize them as such. Third, a micro-level interaction between an entrepreneur’s level of optionality and perceived value was found to
underpin the exploratory and exploitative behaviour in the opportunity development process. It is
this micro-level interaction that the objective or subjective state of an opportunity may be clarified.
Overall, the reconceptualised opportunity construct can anchor the research trajectory of interested
participants embodying a design perspective while also offering a foundation for conceptual and
empirical work on entrepreneurship concepts outside of opportunities. Furthermore, considering
the highly dynamic digital environment in which entrepreneurs operate, scholars and practitioners
can benefit from having a new understanding of opportunities as emergent from human–artefact
interactions and activities, and not just as dichotomous discovered or created instruments of
economic profit. | en |
dc.contributor.sponsor | Strathclyde Business School | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | The University of Edinburgh | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Ding, T. (2019) Understanding the design of opportunities: Re-evaluating the agent-opportunity nexus through a design lens. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 11, e00108. | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | : The promise of viewing opportunities as emergent: On perceiving and exploiting affordances in an entrepreneurial process | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Ding, T. (2021) What if opportunities are conceived as design artifacts? Academy of Management Perspectives, 35(2), 310–313. | en |
dc.subject | entrepreneurship | en |
dc.subject | opportunity phenomenon | en |
dc.title | Opportunity at the crossroads, where do we go from here? Evidence and conceptualisation of a non-dichotomous emergent opportunity | en |
dc.type | Thesis or Dissertation | en |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en |
dc.type.qualificationname | PhD Doctor of Philosophy | en |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2024-01-24 | en |
dcterms.accessRights | Restricted Access | en |