Edinburgh Research Archive logo

Edinburgh Research Archive

University of Edinburgh homecrest
View Item 
  •   ERA Home
  • Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, School of
  • Linguistics and English Language
  • Linguistics and English Language PhD thesis collection
  • View Item
  •   ERA Home
  • Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, School of
  • Linguistics and English Language
  • Linguistics and English Language PhD thesis collection
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Causation is non-eventive

View/Open
PageAK_2023.pdf (783.1Kb)
Date
14/02/2023
Author
Page, Anna Katarina
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
This thesis presents a system developed to account for the observation that subverbal causation is present in stative structures, which requires a reanalysis of the subverbal primitives involved in causal structures (e. g. McCawley (1968); Dowty (1979)) where cause is not attributed eventive meaning nor restricted to combining with eventive arguments. The foundation of the system developed here is the idea that the contribution and role of any functional head should be minimal and consistent across contexts. With this in mind, I show that cause can not be attributed either the role of introducing Agent arguments, nor the role of introducing changesof- state. The first task is factored out to do, the latter to become. The contribution of cause itself is shown to be the following: i) it introduces inanimate Causers, either eventive or stative in its specifier, ii) it introduces the result in its complement, either directly as in statives, or by embedding another event, usually a change-of-state associated with become, iii) when its specifier is unfilled, which can only be the case when the subject of the sentence is an Agent, an implicit event argument is inserted in the unrealised specifier position. Further, it is shown that the arguments of cause must be eventualities and these eventualities must be of the same ontological category: either both states or both events. This restriction cause places on its arguments is termed ontological harmony. Although developed to account for stative causation, the system presented here is shown to have a number of explanatory consequences. The conclusion that eventiveness must be associated with either do or become is seen to explain alternations in entailment patterns across a number of different verb classes, including provoke-class psych verbs, causativised activity verbs and biclausal quasi-causals, a class that cuts across familiar previously defined classes. This has implications for how verbs are classified, suggesting a move away from classifying verbs on the basis of Aktionsarten, towards on the basis of their subverbal meaning primitives.
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1842/39841

http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/3089
Collections
  • Linguistics and English Language PhD thesis collection

Library & University Collections HomeUniversity of Edinburgh Information Services Home
Privacy & Cookies | Takedown Policy | Accessibility | Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Contact
feed RSS Feeds

RSS Feed not available for this page

 

 

All of ERACommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication TypeSponsorSupervisorsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication TypeSponsorSupervisors
LoginRegister

Library & University Collections HomeUniversity of Edinburgh Information Services Home
Privacy & Cookies | Takedown Policy | Accessibility | Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Contact
feed RSS Feeds

RSS Feed not available for this page