Causation is non-eventive
View/ Open
Date
14/02/2023Author
Page, Anna Katarina
Metadata
Abstract
This thesis presents a system developed to account for the observation
that subverbal causation is present in stative structures, which requires
a reanalysis of the subverbal primitives involved in causal structures
(e. g. McCawley (1968); Dowty (1979)) where cause is not attributed
eventive meaning nor restricted to combining with eventive arguments. The
foundation of the system developed here is the idea that the contribution
and role of any functional head should be minimal and consistent across
contexts. With this in mind, I show that cause can not be attributed either
the role of introducing Agent arguments, nor the role of introducing changesof-
state. The first task is factored out to do, the latter to become. The
contribution of cause itself is shown to be the following: i) it introduces
inanimate Causers, either eventive or stative in its specifier, ii) it introduces
the result in its complement, either directly as in statives, or by embedding
another event, usually a change-of-state associated with become, iii) when
its specifier is unfilled, which can only be the case when the subject of the
sentence is an Agent, an implicit event argument is inserted in the unrealised
specifier position. Further, it is shown that the arguments of cause must
be eventualities and these eventualities must be of the same ontological
category: either both states or both events. This restriction cause places
on its arguments is termed ontological harmony.
Although developed to account for stative causation, the system presented
here is shown to have a number of explanatory consequences. The conclusion
that eventiveness must be associated with either do or become is seen to
explain alternations in entailment patterns across a number of different verb
classes, including provoke-class psych verbs, causativised activity verbs and
biclausal quasi-causals, a class that cuts across familiar previously defined
classes. This has implications for how verbs are classified, suggesting a move
away from classifying verbs on the basis of Aktionsarten, towards on the
basis of their subverbal meaning primitives.