Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAnderson, Charles
dc.contributor.advisorSangster, Pauline
dc.contributor.authorBovill, Mary
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-19T11:26:26Z
dc.date.available2023-04-19T11:26:26Z
dc.date.issued2015-11-27
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1842/40493
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.7488/era/3259
dc.description.abstractThere is a large body of research within literary theory which explores conceptions of'text' and textual practices. However, school teachers' conceptions of texts and textual practices remain a relatively unexplored area. Curriculum reform in Scotland has focused on the development of a competencies-based curriculum, with particular attention given to interdisciplinary learning. This has encouraged the professional development of secondary school teachers' approaches to teaching methodologies and learning and assessment; but there exists a current gap in the literature of the voice of practising teachers of history and English in secondary school on their beliefs about texts and textual practices in their own subject areas. This study has set out to examine the beliefs of practising teachers about how they orientate and frame pupils' engagement with language patterns, structures and themes. In doing so, comparisons and contrasts have been drawn between conceptions and practices in the two subjects of English and History, thereby enabling the distinctive purposes and values of each subject to stand out in sharper relief. A key consideration in this study was to examine good practice. Therefore the teachers selected for interview were chosen on the basis of their reputation as skilled practitioners who teach primarily through the medium of texts. This thesis reports on a series of ten extensive, semi-structured, focused interviews with five principal teachers of English and five principal teachers of history who taught in schools across Scotland in varying socio¬ economic areas. Interpretative phenomenological analysis of interview transcripts revealed three central themes: what the teachers regarded as the purpose of their subject in the secondary curriculum; conceptions of'text' and textual practices; and their beliefs concerning specific attitudes and dispositions that were viewed to be important to the learner's developing conception of literary and historical purposes and practices. What emerged from this study was a range of views on how to prepare pupils for textual engagement with literary and historical texts; approaches to positioning pupils within the world of historical texts and develop ways of being with literary texts, relating to the contextualization process, emerged as significantly contrasting between subject disciplines. The teachers also revealed their commitment to certain interpretative practices that were seen to unleash the transformative power of language and to contribute to the development of selfhood. Key matters to emerge from this study were the teachers' representations of dynamic ways of being with, and knowing about, literary and historical texts, both within the worlds of the texts and also in the way in which pupils then come to 'read' the world itself. The phenomenological nature of textual engagement is presented in terms of the way in which the teachers believed that certain textual practices contributed to the structuring of human consciousness. Epistemological and ontological shaping; analytical distancing; acquiring and deploying a language of analysis; and the positioning and framing of pupils' engagement with texts were seen to be fundamental to the processes involved in reading literary and historical texts. The transformative power of language was identified as key in developing pupils' existential and ethical awareness for history as well as for English. Perspective-shifting, developing empathic awareness and experiencing ontological and epistemological disturbance emerged as factors that featured in the teachers' pedagogical approaches to developing critical stances. Whilst the study reported here is on a small-scale, it has provided a fine¬ grained delineation of how a set of accomplished teachers view the purposes and practices of secondary school English and History, thereby contributing to knowledge of a relatively unexplored area. The key findings of the thesis can also serve to stimulate reflection and debate over the purposes of school-level History and English, providing a means for English and history school teachers and post-graduate education tutors (PGDE) to consider closely how they engage pupils with literary and historical texts in order to develop learners as empathic readers, social critics and literary apprentices. In doing so, it is the intention of this study to delineate to a finer degree the comparisons and contrasts in these subject specialists' conceptions and beliefs about the purposes and practices of their subject disciplines. Due attention will therefore be given to the distinct nature of each epistemic discipline and to the pedagogical beliefs of each community of practice. It will be argued that whilst some of these findings could contribute to future discussions on approaches to interdisciplinary learning, the complexities attached to each community's pedagogical practices and epistemic goals will require more translation within and between each community of practice.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherThe University of Edinburghen
dc.subjectliterary theoryen
dc.subjectschool teachersen
dc.subjectcompetencies-based curriculumen
dc.subjectinterdisciplinary learningen
dc.subjectsecondary school teachersen
dc.subjecthistoryen
dc.subjectEnglishen
dc.subjectsecondary schoolen
dc.titleWays of being, ways of knowing: framing pupils' engagement with literary and historical textsen
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD Doctor of Philosophyen


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record