Markets, morals and medicalised maternity: navigating a shifting health service terrain in Bangladesh
View/ Open
Perkins2023.pdf (4.196Mb)
Date
25/04/2023Item status
Restricted AccessEmbargo end date
25/04/2024Author
Perkins, Janet
Metadata
Abstract
This thesis lies at the nexus of recent transitions towards medicalised childbirth,
marketisation of maternal health services and moralities of care, examining how
women, their families and health actors navigate maternal terrains in transition in
Bangladesh. Until recently, women in Bangladesh were characterised by academics,
policymakers and global health practitioners as reticent to uptake biomedical
pregnancy and birth care. Today, the use of advanced biomedical maternal
technologies, made available through minimally regulated health markets even in the
most remote areas and placed within the grasp of women of all social classes, is
ubiquitous. While anthropological scholarship has primarily approached health
markets as an outgrowth of global neoliberal hegemony and as de facto ‘immoral’, this
thesis destabilises these assumptions, attending to the situatedness of maternal
health markets in Bangladesh and seeking to understand the ways that moralities of
care emerge and are renegotiated on their own terms. Based on 18 months of
ethnographic fieldwork within national health policymaking and programming circles in
Dhaka and among health service managers, providers and women in Kushtia district,
it argues that the rise of maternal health markets in Bangladesh is embedded in and
reflects a distinctly Bangladeshi political, social and economic context, rather than a
global homogenising agenda. It argues that maternal health markets in Kushtia have
mushroomed not in response to a perceived retreat of the state but in response to a
public health system perceived as fundamentally fragmented, failing to deliver ‘care’,
and existing solely to respond to ‘the poor’ (gorib manush). This thesis contends that
while maternal health ‘care’ in public settings often appears ‘uncaring’, this apparent
‘uncaring-ness’ is structured by government providers’ moral imperatives to provide
‘service’ (sheba), though not necessarily personalised, hands-on ‘care’ (jotno),
challenging the often taken-for-granted coupling of clinical care and affective care.
While commodified services come at a cost, both financially and in terms of clinical
quality, markets provide imagined spaces where women might access ‘care’ (jotno)
beyond ‘service’ (sheba). In addition to opportunities for women, maternal health
markets expand possibilities to pursue formal and informal livelihoods for people of all
social classes. Nevertheless, while opening economic opportunities where livelihood-making is more generally precarious, this thesis argues that morality is also central to
the project of health market-making in Kushtia. Both formal and informal actors
navigate and negotiate this morally ambiguous space as they seek to secure
livelihoods and conform to moral imperatives. This thesis traces women’s and their
families’ navigation to fulfil aspirations for maternal health services in this nebulous
space-in-the-making. It argues that social navigation principally demands nurturing
and leveraging social connectedness to access biomedical resources, destabilising
logics underpinning conceptualisations of health services either as ‘entitlements’,
delivered by a state based on citizenship or as pure ‘market commodities’, delivered
through a health market according to the principles of classical economics. Indeed,
rather than a manifestation of hegemonic neoliberal ideologies, the maternal health
terrain in Kushtia reflects the nimble and situated navigation of actors pursuing health,
economic and moral ambitions, both responding to and constituting states of flux and
transition long inherent to the Bangladeshi experience.