Inspection time in patients with intracranial tumours before and after neurosurgery
View/ Open
Date
2010Author
Scotland, Jennifer L
Metadata
Abstract
Introduction: Many patients with brain tumours experience dysfunction in several
cognitive domains. Given the limited survival times of the majority of patients with
brain tumours, maintenance or improvement of quality of life is as important as
increasing survival time. Impaired cognition has a negative impact on quality of life
and as such, cognitive function is becoming an increasingly important endpoint in
clinical trials in neuro-oncology. However, measuring cognition in patients with
brain tumours is problematic for a number of reasons. Most intracranial tumours are
initially treated with surgery and studies of neurosurgical morbidity often evaluate
physical as opposed to cognitive domains, yet the latter can have a greater negative
impact on the patient’s quality of life. This thesis therefore details cognition in brain
tumour patients at the time of presentation (pre-operatively) and examines the effects
of surgical intervention on cognitive function. Of particular interest is the potential
utility of inspection time, a computer-based measure of the brain’s information
processing efficiency, as a measure of brain slowing as a result of the tumour and as
an indicator of response to surgical intervention.
Methods: The study is based on a cohort of 118 newly-presenting patients with a
supratentorial brain tumour who were to have surgery (biopsy or resection). Each
patient was administered a comprehensive battery of cognitive tests prior to surgery
(baseline). The battery comprised inspection time testing, other standardised
cognitive measures and assessment of mood, quality of life and functional status.
Post-operatively, each patient repeated the inspection time test in addition to a
selected number of the other tests administered at baseline. For comparison, a group
of patients admitted for elective spinal surgery (n = 85) were also tested pre- and
post-operatively. A group of healthy volunteers provided a second control group by
being tested twice (n = 80). Results: The brain tumour cohort were significantly impaired by comparison with
both control groups at baseline (pre-operatively) on the majority of the cognitive
measures, including inspection time. Baseline inspection time scores were
significantly related to some scores on the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire in
the brain tumour group, but not in the spinal surgery group. There was no significant
difference between the brain tumour and spinal surgery groups in term of the levels
of pre-operative anxiety and depression.
The brain tumour cohort showed significantly greater relative deterioration on
inspection time following surgery by comparison with both control groups. The brain
tumour cohort also deteriorated significantly on several other measures postoperatively
by comparison with the healthy control group.
Detailed analyses were carried out to determine the differential effects of tumour
type, location, and type of surgery (biopsy or resection) on inspection time and other
functions in the brain tumour group.
Conclusions: Tumour-related cognitive impairment appears to be common in a
heterogeneous group of brain tumour patients with a variety of different tumours
located throughout the brain. Surgical intervention has a negative impact on function
in brain tumour patients, although this deterioration may be transient. General
slowing of visual information processing appears to be common to brain tumour
patients and the inspection time task provides a feasible and useful method of
assessment in brain tumour patients. The task is sensitive to tumour-related brain
slowing and can provide a reliable assessment of response to surgery. Given the
task’s advantages over more commonly-used cognitive measures, it could be usefully
incorporated into cognitive tests batteries in neuro-oncology.