dc.contributor.advisor | MacQueen, Hector L | en |
dc.contributor.advisor | Waelde, Charlotte | en |
dc.contributor.author | Black, Gillian | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-05-17T14:56:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-05-17T14:56:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-06-30 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1842/5943 | |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis examines publicity exploitation in practice and the possible legal response
of Scots law to that exploitation. It argues that the common law in Scotland is not
capable of providing a coherent and principled right of publicity for individuals, and
that a statutory right is instead required. By examining the nature of publicity
exploitation and the activities that constitute publicity, it becomes clear that there are
a number of different methods by which an individual’s “persona” – name, image,
identity and reputation – can be used to enhance the goods and services of others,
and that this enhancement is something for which other parties are willing to pay.
The first part of this thesis explores publicity in practice, in order to derive a
framework and vocabulary on which to build the subsequent legal analysis. One
conclusion reached here is that, whereas much case law and academic commentary
focuses on the unauthorised use of persona, authorised exploitation is more common
and more lucrative for the individual. Both authorised and unauthorised use
therefore need to be represented in a publicity right. The second part explores
justifications for establishing a legal right to regulate the exploitation of publicity and
to enable the control of such exploitation by the individual in question. These
justifications reflect the dual interests at stake in publicity rights, being dignitarian
interests in the use and control of one’s persona, and economic interests in the
financial value of such use. The third part of the thesis draws upon the findings of
the first two parts in order to assess the most appropriate legal classification of a right
of publicity. The conclusion reached is that publicity cannot be sufficiently protected
through established real rights or personal rights. Instead, the hybrid nature of
publicity, comprising dignitarian and economic interests, should most appropriately
be protected through a right in the nature of exclusive privilege (a concept already
known in Scots law). This right is capable of enabling the necessary control of
persona for the individual, subject to appropriate limitations to recognise the
competing interests of other parties. These limits include freedom of expression and
cultural communication. The final conclusion is that such a statutory right of
exclusive privilege would be best placed to give principled and coherent effect to a
right of publicity in Scots law. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | The University of Edinburgh | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Black, Gillian (published as Gillian Davies), “The cult of celebrity and trade marks: the next instalment” (2004) 1:2 SCRIPT-ed 230 | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Black, Gillian, “A new experience in contract damages? Reflections on Experience Hendrix v PPX Enterprises Ltd” 2005 JR 31 | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Black, Gillian, “Data protection law in light of Durant v Financial Services Authority” 2004 JR 295 | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Black, Gillian, “Editorial: Douglas v Hello! – An OK! result” (2007) 4:2 SCRIPT-ed 161 | en |
dc.relation.hasversion | Black, Gillian, “OK! for some: Douglas v Hello! in the House of Lords” (2007) 11 Edin LR 402 | en |
dc.subject | Scots law | en |
dc.subject | publicity | en |
dc.subject | privacy | en |
dc.subject | celebrity | en |
dc.title | Right of publicity in Scots law | en |
dc.type | Thesis or Dissertation | en |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en |
dc.type.qualificationname | PhD Doctor of Philosophy | en |