dc.contributor.advisor | Cowie, Claire | en |
dc.contributor.advisor | Steedman, Mark | en |
dc.contributor.author | Candelas, Abigael | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-19T12:16:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-19T12:16:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-11-23 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1842/6040 | |
dc.description.abstract | Traditionally, formal linguistic approaches have assumed that a ective stance
(Ochs 1992, Ja e 2009) is not part of a linguistic expression's semantics,
although recent approaches have sought to integrate stance and other aspects of
social discourse into semantic approaches (McConnell-Ginet 2002, 2006, 2008;
Potts 2003, 2005). In this paper I will outline some of the de nitional and
methodological areas of concern in current stance research. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | The University of Edinburgh | en |
dc.subject | stance-commitments | en |
dc.subject | lexicosyntactic | en |
dc.title | And some other uncontroversial words: the status of stance commitments in the lexicosyntactic variation of identity labels | en |
dc.type | Thesis or Dissertation | en |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Masters | en |
dc.type.qualificationname | MSc Master of Science | en |
dcterms.accessRights | Restricted Access | en |