Edinburgh Research Archive logo

Edinburgh Research Archive

University of Edinburgh homecrest
View Item 
  •   ERA Home
  • Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, School of
  • Psychology
  • Psychology Masters thesis collection
  • View Item
  •   ERA Home
  • Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, School of
  • Psychology
  • Psychology Masters thesis collection
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Objective measurement of imitation problems in autism

View/Open
Stewart 2011 MSc.pdf (2.084Mb)
Date
23/11/2011
Item status
Restricted Access
Author
Stewart, Hannah J
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Imitation is a complex behaviour used to allow faster learning of skills, including pivotal social cognitive processes such as language and gesture. Difficulties in imitating others have been broadly found within Autistic Spectrum Disorders (ASD) populations. This paper discusses two possible theories explaining these deficits: self-other mapping theory, whereby imitation deficits in ASD have been proposed to restrict the ability to map relationships between social representations of others and themselves; and self-other comparison theory, whereby the individual must distinguish similarities and differences between themself and the other, which are then related to emotional and contextual differences learnt through experience in order to provide emotional context. Whilst imitation difficulties have been widely reported, the recordings of such difficulties have been done subjectively. This paper, however, approaches this well- known phenomenon objectively through the use of a clinical-kinematics assessment tool (C-Kat). Furthermore, this paper discusses different ways to precisely describe the imitative act to be copied and the performance of the imitator. This paper aimed to objectively investigate whether, when compared to typically developing peers, an imitative deficit was present in ASD adolescents (ASD n = 16; TD n = 24). Secondly, it aimed to determine whether such a deficit existed only for bodily imitation. Results showed a clear group difference and suggested a developmental delay in imitation ability within ASD rather than a deficit. Furthermore, results suggested a specific ASD difficulty in bodily imitation. However, following comparison of imitation stimuli and measures, the possibility is discussed that these results may be due to focusing on elements other than the critical movement information within the action to be imitated.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/6066
Collections
  • Psychology Masters thesis collection

Library & University Collections HomeUniversity of Edinburgh Information Services Home
Privacy & Cookies | Takedown Policy | Accessibility | Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Contact
feed RSS Feeds

RSS Feed not available for this page

 

 

All of ERACommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication TypeSponsorSupervisorsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication TypeSponsorSupervisors
LoginRegister

Library & University Collections HomeUniversity of Edinburgh Information Services Home
Privacy & Cookies | Takedown Policy | Accessibility | Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Contact
feed RSS Feeds

RSS Feed not available for this page