Edinburgh Research Archive logo

Edinburgh Research Archive

University of Edinburgh homecrest
View Item 
  •   ERA Home
  • Geosciences, School of
  • GeoSciences MSc thesis collection
  • View Item
  •   ERA Home
  • Geosciences, School of
  • GeoSciences MSc thesis collection
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Multi-Objective Methods for Reserve Site Selection: A Case Study Selecting Priority Sites for Conservation in Belize

View/Open
source.zip (997.1Kb)
dissertation.pdf (11.32Mb)
Date
29/11/2012
Item status
Restricted Access
Author
Lefkaditis, Nikolaos
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Systematic conservation planning encompasses a range of data-driven optimisation techniques that are often used to prioritise geographical areas in terms of ecological significance. This evaluation is usually based on criteria that represent the socioeconomic costs associated with conserving specific sites, the landscape properties of the proposed reserve networks and various measures for the included biodiversity features. In this study, biological and socioeconomic data for the lowland savannas of Belize have been combined into layers that reflect the three aforementioned properties and the reserve design problem has been described in a purely multi-objective way that does not require the designation of arbitrary weights for the various criteria. Subsequently, the applicability of two multi-objective optimisation algorithms in solving this version of the reserve design problem for Belizean lowland savannas is explored. It is hypothesized that the multi-objective methods may be able to indicate reserve network configurations that are representative of the full range of potential trade-offs between selected objectives. The results of the implemented algorithms are compared to a series of solutions obtained by MARXAN, a well-established conservation planning software tool. The findings are discussed in detail and indicate that the two methods are effective in approximating certain areas of the trade-off surface between different objectives, but do not produce solutions across its entirety according to the original hypothesis. Two factors that contribute to loss of solution diversity are identified and attributed to the effect of certain implementation choices on the evolvability of the optimisation algorithms.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/6275
Collections
  • GeoSciences MSc thesis collection

Library & University Collections HomeUniversity of Edinburgh Information Services Home
Privacy & Cookies | Takedown Policy | Accessibility | Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Contact
feed RSS Feeds

RSS Feed not available for this page

 

 

All of ERACommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication TypeSponsorSupervisorsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication TypeSponsorSupervisors
LoginRegister

Library & University Collections HomeUniversity of Edinburgh Information Services Home
Privacy & Cookies | Takedown Policy | Accessibility | Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Contact
feed RSS Feeds

RSS Feed not available for this page