dc.description.abstract | A religious belief in verbal inspiration gave the Christian Bible its sacred
text status within the matrix of the Church. The lower, or textual criticism, first
practiced outside the sanction of the Church by Erasmus and developed ftirther
by non-Trinitarians initially, offered the first significant direct challenge to this
belief in the early modern period. This, the dissertation argues, was the proper
beginning, phenomenologically speaking, of the process of desacralization.
Moreover, it is arguedt hat the desacralizing role of the lower criticism was
further manifested when it was discovered that certain theologically significant
passages, perceived by those in the Erasmian school to have resulted from later
interpolation into the text of Scripture, illegitimately lent support to dogmas
such as the Trinity, the deity of Christ and the virgin birth. The practice of lower
criticism set in motion, well before the arrival of the higher criticism, a rather
significant awakening of a historical consciousness about the developmental
stages of the N. T. text, which in later recensions reflected a more full-blown
orthodox expression of christological. themes. The role that the lower criticism
played in introducing this historical consciousness has not been readily
acknowledged by either historians or practitioners of the discipline of lower
criticism.
The dissertation argues that this is because of an ideological framing of the
historical details of the discipline in development. This ideological component
and the historical circumstances prompting it are brought into relief revealing
why two schools arose during the English Enlightenment and carried on into
the Victorian era, responding to the data of text criticism in two directions: one
interpreting the data as affecting dogma, the other interpreting the data as not
affecting dogma. In answering why this came about the dissertation helps to
explain how the quest for the historical text culminated in the quest for the
historical Jesus | en |