Edinburgh Research Archive logo

Edinburgh Research Archive

University of Edinburgh homecrest
View Item 
  •   ERA Home
  • Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, School of
  • Psychology
  • Psychology Masters thesis collection
  • View Item
  •   ERA Home
  • Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, School of
  • Psychology
  • Psychology Masters thesis collection
  • View Item
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Looking Beyond Improvement: A Multicomponent Exploration of Working Memory Training

View/Open
CookMSc2012.pdf (547.7Kb)
Date
28/11/2012
Item status
Restricted Access
Author
Cook, Evelyn
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The proliferation of enthusiasm into the near and far benefits of working memory (WM) training in recent years has largely been driven by the assumption that WM capacity represents a domain-general limited control mechanism. Proponents of such interventions argue that by continuously taxing such basic processes through adaptive procedures tailored to an individual’s current ability level, there is an increased likelihood of transfer to disparate cognitive domains. However, the field has recently been subject to various critiques. The present study addresses a number of design limitations and answers numerous calls to take a theoretical approach to the assumptions underlying the recent wave of cognitive training research. Participants completed 10 sessions of online WM training that differed with regard to an adaptively tailored (experimental) or randomly presented (control) difficulty level. No differences in transfer to measures of WM, processing speed or fluid intelligence were observed between the two groups. Taking a multicomponent approach of WM (Logie, 2011), the change in the ability to recall both phonologically and visually similar sequences of letters was explored. No reliable evidence of change in the use of domain-specific components was observed. There was a strong involvement of phonological storage to support recall. The need for the field to define appropriate control protocols as well as empirically establish the efficacy of the features and mechanisms currently endorsed in the literature is discussed.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/8486
Collections
  • Psychology Masters thesis collection

Library & University Collections HomeUniversity of Edinburgh Information Services Home
Privacy & Cookies | Takedown Policy | Accessibility | Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Contact
feed RSS Feeds

RSS Feed not available for this page

 

 

All of ERACommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication TypeSponsorSupervisorsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsPublication TypeSponsorSupervisors
LoginRegister

Library & University Collections HomeUniversity of Edinburgh Information Services Home
Privacy & Cookies | Takedown Policy | Accessibility | Contact
Privacy & Cookies
Takedown Policy
Accessibility
Contact
feed RSS Feeds

RSS Feed not available for this page