Training environment in General Practice and preparedness for practice
View/ Open
Wiener-Ogilvie2014.docx (2.686Mb)
Date
04/07/2014Author
Wiener-Ogilvie, Sharon
Ogilvie, Sharon Wiener
Metadata
Abstract
This thesis explores the way General Practice trainees and early career General
Practitioners describe their training environment in General Practice, the meaning
they attach to the notion of preparedness and their perceptions of the impact of the
training environment on their preparedness. The study was informed by the
interpretivist paradigm. I conducted 27 in-depth semi-structured interviews with 15
early career General Practitioners and 12 General Practice trainees at the end of their
training. Interview data were transcribed and analysed thematically, drawing partially
on the grounded theory approach of data analysis.
Interviewees described their training environment in terms of their sense of being
included in the Practice, the Practice ethos, the importance of training within the
Practice, the trainer and their relationship with the trainer. There was no unanimous
way in which interviewees talked about preparedness, however the meanings
attributed to preparedness centred around two central elements ‘confidence’ and
‘adaptability’ and included: working independently and being self directed;
knowledge of business and partnership issues; ability to manage patients and
workload; good consultation skills and effective time management; and adequate
knowledge and passing the RCGP CSA examination.
The way the training Practice can impact on trainees’ preparedness was explained
drawing on Bandura’s theory of ‘self efficacy’ and Lave and Wenger’s theory of
‘situated learning’. Inclusive training Practices, characterised by less hierarchical
relationships between the doctors, particularly vis-à-vis trainees, were better at
preparing trainees for their future role by affording them greater opportunities to take
part in a wider range of General Practice work. The role of the trainer was also
pivotal in preparing trainees through effective teaching. Supervision tailored to
trainees’ needs, and guided decision making enhanced confidence of trainees in their
ability to work independently.