Dscam gene expression in invertebrate immunity : alternative splicing in response to diverse pathogens
View/ Open
Smith2012.docx (8.189Mb)
Date
30/11/2012Author
Smith, Paul Hugh
Metadata
Abstract
Invertebrates show enhanced immunity and even specific primed immunity in response to
repeat infections, analogous to vertebrate adaptive immunity. Little is known of the
mechanism for this phenomenon, or which molecules are involved. A candidate gene for the
underlying mechanism for a pathogen-specific response in invertebrate immunity is Down
syndrome cell adhesion molecule (Dscam). Dscam can produce thousands of different
protein isoforms through the mutually exclusive splicing of many exon variants contained
within variable regions of the gene. It is an important receptor of the invertebrate nervous
system but has been implicated in having a role in immunity. Dscam has been shown to be
involved in phagocytosis across members of the Pancrustacea, and it has been reported to
respond in a pathogen-specific manner in mosquitoes and crayfish. In this thesis, I have
investigated the splicing of Dscam in response to diverse pathogens in different host species.
In the Anopheles mosquito, I cloned and sequenced a fragment of Dscam spanning across
two of its variable exon regions to enable me to detect mutually exclusively splice variants
and their associations in different treatments (Chapter 2). I discovered that the expression
diversity of the hypervariable Dscam is higher in parasite-exposed mosquitoes. In Chapter 3,
I extended the study to the more experimentally amenable Drosophila fruit fly. A new
Illumina-based sequencing assay was developed and implemented to examine more closely
Dscam expression in response to diverse pathogens. The new method successfully quantified
non-random expression of Dscam variable exons 4 and 6. I also describe a small but
detectable effect of pathogen-exposure on the expression of Dscam exon 4 variants. In
Chapter 4, I expanded the work of Chapter 3 to study tissue-specific Dscam expression in
response to well-characterised immune elicitors of Drosophila. I describe how exon 4
variants were expressed in a tissue-specific manner, but not exon 6 variants. I also found a
small exon 4-by-tissue-by-pathogen effect, which although detectable, did not dominate over
the tissue effects. Finally, in Chapter 5, I turned to the crustacean, Daphnia, to study Dscam
expression in a natural host-parasite interaction and in a clonal organism. I describe the non-random
expression of exons 4 and 6, and another small effect of pathogen-exposure on the
expression of Dscam exon 4.
My work aimed to further investigate the putative pathogen-specific alternative splicing of
the hypervariable Dscam receptor. The data presented quantified the constitutive expression
of Dscam exons 4 and 6 in different pancrustacean species. The data also suggest that
infection-responsive splicing of Dscam may occur but that effects are small, and may be
diluted within the background of the highly important Dscam expression of the nervous
system if they exist at all. The study supports the high-throughput sequencing method for
future studies of alternative splicing and Dscam expression.