ERA :: Home

ERA is a digital repository of original research produced at The University of Edinburgh. The archive contains documents written by, or affiliated with, academic authors, or units, based at Edinburgh that have sufficient quality to be collected and preserved by the Library, but which are not controlled by commercial publishers. Holdings include full-text digital doctoral theses, masters dissertations, project reports, briefing papers and out-of-print materials.

Information on current research activity including staff, projects and publications is available via the Edinburgh Research Explorer.

Now showing 1 - 40 of 41

Recent Submissions

Should some direct sex discrimination claims under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 be re-classified as 'sex related discrimination' claims?
(The University of Edinburgh. College of Humamities and Social Sciences, 2026-07-13) Glazer, Alan H.; Cabrelli, David; Lawton, Amy
Sex discrimination has been and continues to be, an endemic social ill in the UK. To tackle it, a multifactorial approach is required involving pressure group action, collective bargaining and litigation, to name but a few approaches. This thesis focuses on the litigation option, with a focus on how the system of sex discrimination law can be strengthened. Section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 (2010 Act or Act) defines direct sex discrimination as less favourable treatment of an individual because of sex. There is no defence to a direct sex discrimination claim. Indirect sex discrimination occurs, under section 19 of the 2010 Act, where a neutral provision, criterion or practice has a disproportionately adverse impact on a group of people of the same sex. The claimant must be of the same sex as the group which is disadvantaged and share the disadvantage with the group. Indirect discrimination can be justified by the employer using a proportionality defence. Direct and indirect sex discrimination claims are mutually exclusive: a claimant can plead either in the alternative, but the same discriminatory conduct cannot be both direct and indirect discrimination at the same time. The thesis takes the position that this strictly dichotomous approach is problematic for sex discrimination litigants and judges who must adjudicate such cases. In particular, I argue, with reference to case-law, that there is a subcategory of sex discrimination claims which cannot be accurately described as either direct or indirect sex discrimination. Instead, these cases fall within a conceptual “gap” between the two. At present, there is no legal claim to fill this “gap.” The central question posed by the thesis is: how should the legislature close this “gap?” Having identified the problem, the thesis goes on to exemplify it by critically evaluating the House of Lords decision in James v Eastleigh Borough Council (“James”). The result of this analysis is two-fold: (1) James, like the other cases analysed in the thesis, is neither an example of direct nor indirect discrimination. Instead, the potentially adverse treatment is “related” to sex. (2) The law on direct sex discrimination has been emptied of its moral and legal content by the James case in light of the fact that the Law Lords had to try and squeeze the facts of the case within the strictly dichotomous headings of direct or indirect discrimination. Given this impasse, the thesis engages in a critical review of the existing literature, which tries to solve these problems, but these pre-existing theories are found wanting. As a result, I move on to construct a “sex related discrimination” model which can be applied to James, and cases like it. The application of the model to the James case demonstrates the utility of this intermediate head of claim. Indeed, it is argued that the law should include the “sex related discrimination” claim to make the system of UK sex discrimination laws more cohesive and robust. This will provide claimants with a broader range of potential sex discrimination claims. It will also re-align the respective claims with their philosophical underpinnings and promote judicial transparency.
From flat sheet to three-dimensional non-planar concrete formwork: a composite system integrating Kerf bending and curve-folding for the fabrication of architectural non-standard concrete elements
(2026-07-07) Rame, Badih; Carter, Kate; Dias, Marcelo; Edinburgh College of Art, University of Edinburgh: Doctoral Scholarship
Despite the recent development in digital technologies, materials innovations, and production processes; the construction industry, particularly in the field of concrete formwork, continues to undergo development. Although concrete, the most widely used material globally, is criticized for its carbon emissions, it offers unparalleled potential for achieving geometric freedom in the creation of complex, non-planar, and innovative architectural designs. Non planar forms can also be more structurally efficient and provide a reduced carbon footprint when compared with rectilinear forms. Across the range of concrete construction, the basic nature of the material is inherently simple but the complexity lies in the process of making. Even with extensive ongoing research within the context of design + construction of non-planar concrete, it is still challenging to construct curved concrete forms. This is due to the complexity and high cost of non-standard formwork. Furthermore, curved moulds require a great deal of material, time, and labour to use effectively; and are difficult to reuse. This presents a substantial source of waste. With the aim of overcoming the current challenges related to site processes, environmental sustainability, and construction cost, this research proposes a new formwork system integrating kerf bending and curve-folding approaches for constructing curved concrete elements. The system also addresses the needs of contractors and builders who understand the use of conventional planar formwork, but lack access to or proficiency in advanced digital technologies. By enhancing the flexibility of commonly used two dimensional materials in traditional formwork construction, mainly plywood, to enable the creation of three-dimensional forms, this novel approach to formwork has the potential to contribute to more efficient and sustainable concrete construction. Practical experiments, prototype design development, and construction of curved concrete forms served as the basis for validating this concept. Additionally, qualitative analysis of case studies and industry interviews provided insights into real-world applications and further supported the development of the formwork system. Through iterative testing, refinement, and feedback loops, the research sought to develop a complete construction process that demonstrated that it is possible to fabricate structurally efficient, non-standard concrete forms through a practical, user-friendly, and industry-feasible methods while at the same time reducing waste, lowering costs, enhancing sustainability, and expanding architectural potential.
Moving Water II. North Sea Edge
(University of Edinburgh, 2026) Faed , Andrea; Green, Jack
Degree Show Catalogue documenting an ESALA MArch (Modular Pathway) studio ‘Moving Water II. North Sea Edge’. Studio Leaders: Andrea Faed and Jack Green. 2025-2026.
Identifying core genes, proteins and possible drug targets for type 1 diabetes with novel statistical genetics methods and large-scale omics data
(2026-04-23) Zhou, Xuan; Spiliopoulou, Athina; Theodoratou, Evropi; McKeigue, Paul; University of Edinburgh: Chancellor’s Fellowship
BACKGROUND: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease in which the body’s immune system destroys insulin-producing β cells in the pancreas. 9.5 million people are living with clinically diagnosed T1D globally in 2025, and this figure is projected to increase to 14.7 million in 2040. People with T1D require lifelong insulin therapy and glucose monitoring and have an increased risk for both acute and chronic complications. There is currently no cure for T1D. Only one agent—teplizumab, an anti-CD3 antibody—has been licensed for delaying progression from islet autoimmunity to clinical T1D but has a median delay of 32.5 months. Stem cell therapy for T1D has shown some promise, but it is still at early-stage clinical trials with tiny sample sizes; its long-term effects in a wider population remain unknown. Human genetic evidence in support of a causal role for a drug target in a given indication increases the probability of success in clinical trials by 2.6-fold. T1D has a strong genetic predisposition, with a sibling recurrence risk ratio estimated between 15 and 20. Around half of the total genetic component is attributable to variants in the humanleukocyte antigen (HLA) region. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified around a hundred genomic regions associated with T1D outside the HLA region, which collectively explain another 25% of the genetic component. However, the translation of GWAS findings to drug targets hasbeenlimitedduetothecomplexityofmappingGWAShitstothecausalgenes and functional mechanisms mediating the genetic effects. The aim of this thesis was to leverage a novel framework of genetic analysis together with available large-scale omics data to identify core genes proximal to T1D pathogenesis and thus to provide human genetic evidence for prioritising drug targets for T1D. METHODS: To detect core genes and proteins for T1D, I first performed genome-wide aggre gated trans-effects (GATE) analysis in two T1D datasets: a Scottish dataset and UKBiobank. For eachindividual in these two T1D datasets, I computed genotyp ically predicted protein levels by taking a weighted sum of their genotypes over trans-protein quantitative trait loci (trans-pQTL). Summary statistics for trans pQTLwereextractedfromthreelargeproteomicsstudies: theUKBiobankPharma Proteomics Project (UKB-PPP), deCODE, and INTERVAL. Genotypically pre dicted levels for each protein (GATE scores) were tested for association with T1D. Individuals in the UKB-PPP dataset were not included in the UK Biobank subset used to test associations with T1D. Putative core proteins were selected based on the strength of the association (p-value < 10−6) and the number of effective trans-pQTLs (> 5) contributing to the GATE score. While these stringent thresholds were applied to limit detection of false positive findings, they may also result in missing true effects that are smaller or nois ier. To get a more comprehensive list of core proteins for T1D, I subsequently performed a second study adopting an alternative strategy. Using the plasma protein measurements from the UKB-PPP dataset in 190 T1D cases and 36870 controls without diabetes, I first tested the measured levels of 2919 proteins for association with T1D and then validated significantly associated proteins using their GATE scores in the Scottish dataset and UK Biobank. Proteins associated with T1D both at the measured level (p < 10−6) and the genetically predicted level (p-value < 0.001 in either dataset) with a consistent direction of effect and a larger magnitude of effect size at the measured level were declared as potential core proteins. In both studies, a series of additional, prespecified lines of evidence was evalu ated to support or refute a causal role for each identified protein in T1D, including Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis with trans-pQTLs as instruments, anno tation of monogenic causes of autoimmune diabetes, cis-score association with T1D, annotation of known T1D GWAS hits, protein association with T1D, and review of reported evidence in experimental animal models and drug effects in humans. Having identified core proteins for T1D from my two studies, I then performed a follow-up study to evaluate if the transcript and protein levels of these pro teins were different in individuals who progressed to islet autoimmunity (IA) or overt T1D compared with those who did not. I leveraged transcriptomic and proteomic data in the Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY)study, which included 418 pairs of persistent IA and 114 pairs of clinical T1D in a nested case-control design with incidence density sampling. Average transcript (measured by microarray and RNA sequencing) and protein levels (measured by the Olink Target 96 Inflammation panel) before the age of one year were calculated from available measurements for each individual. Comparison of the measured activity of core genes/proteins between those who progressed to IA or T1D within the next six years of follow-up and those who did not was performed using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: In total, 2864 scores with morethan5trans-pQTLscorrespondingto2340unique proteins were tested for association with T1D in the Scottish dataset and 3212 scores for 2580 unique proteins in UK Biobank. The GATE analysis identified 25 putative core proteins in the Scottish dataset (p < 10−6), 12 of them replicated in the UKBiobank(p <0.001). Twoadditional putative core proteins were identified in the UK Biobank (p < 10−6), and both replicated in the Scottish dataset (p < 0.001). The strongest association was with PDCD1 (log odds ratio = 0.21, p = 6 ×10−24). Of the 27 putative core proteins, 11 were supported by a dose response relationship in the MR analysis; rare variants in PDCD1 had been discovered to cause autoimmune diabetes; CXCL9 was supported with a cis score association of T1D; 4 are located within 200 kb from previously reported T1D GWAS hits for T1D; 11 were supported by protein associations; 9 were supported by experimental perturbation in mouse models; and 1 was supported by drug effects in humans. Functionally, four proteins (PDCD1, LAG3, CD5, and TIGIT) are immune checkpoint receptors, four (CXCL9, CXCL10, CCL19, CXCL11) are chemokines, two (NCR1 and KLRB1) are receptors expressed on natural killer cells, and eight (PRSS27, AGR2, FGF19, GCG, CCK, CFC1, TCN1, REG1B) are relevant to pancreas and gut functions. In the UKB-PPP dataset, 257 proteins were found to be associated with T1D (p < 10−6) after adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, kidney filtration, liver function, and medication use. Among these proteins, 255 had available GATE scores and were tested for association with T1D in the UK Biobank and Scottish dataset. Fourteen proteins were further supported by their GATE score association with T1D in the UK Biobank and 13 in the Scottish dataset. Together, 24 unique proteins were identified as potential core proteins. Among these, CFC1 and KLRB1 were detected as putative core proteins in the original GATE analysis, while the remaining 22 proteins represented novel findings. Among the novel hits, CD28, ADA2, and ADGRE2 were supported with a dose-response effect by MRanalysis; CD274 had been reported as a monogenic cause of autoimmune diabetes; CD28 is located proximate to known GWAS hits; NOTCH1, CD28, TN FRSF4, ITGB2, ALCAM, and CD274 were supported by experimental evidence in animal models; and CD274 and CD28 were supported by drug effects in hu mans. Functionally, CD28 and TNFRSF4 are co-stimulatory immune checkpoint receptors, CD274 encodes a ligand to PDCD1, PRSS2, PNLIPRP1, and MUC2 are gut and pancreatic proteins, and NOTCH1 and its ligand DLL1 are involved in both embryonic development and immune regulation. In total, the previous two analyses identified 49 unique candidate proteins. Tran scripts for all 49 proteins were available in the TEDDY study, while serum protein levels for only eight of them (CXCL11, CXCL9, CCL19, CD5, CXCL10, FGF19, LTA, CD274)weremeasured. Withthemicroarraydata, averagetranscriptlevels before the age of one for PDCD1 and CD48 were nominally associated with incident IA developed within the next six years of follow-up (N = 104 pairs), and those for PDCH17 and AGR2 were nominally associated with incident T1D (N = 54 pairs). Using the RNA-seq data, average transcript levels for six genes were associated with incident IA (N = 274 pairs), with only the association from SIGLEC6 remaining statistically significant after multiple testing correction. Average serum protein levels before the age of one for LTA and CCL19 levels were associated with incident IA (N = 307 pairs), and the LTA association remained significant after correction for multiple testing. DISCUSSION: This thesis presents a comprehensive investigation of core genes and proteins proximal to T1D pathogenesis and identification of plausible drug targets using novel statistical genetic approaches and multi-omics data. The findings highlight the primary roles of immune checkpoint signalling, reinforce the contribution of innate immunity, and support the potential involvement of the exocrine pancreas and gut in the pathogenesis of T1D. By systematically assessing several lines of evidence in support of causality of each of the 49 putative core proteins in T1D and reviewing what is known about their safety and technical feasibility as possible drug targets, the 49 proteins were classified into four categories: (1) strong causal evidence with existing drugs in clinical pipelines (PDCD1, CD274, LAG3, CD28, and TNFRSF4); (2) strong causal evidence with agents at preclinical stages (LGALS9, IDO1, and TIGIT); (3) strong causal evidence but requiring further evaluation of technical feasibil ity (CD5, CD48, NCR1, KLRB1, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, CCL19, FASLG, NOTCH1, and DLL1); and (4) requiring further validation of causal relationships (including all the pancreatic and gut proteins and other immune proteins). Studying the activity level of these proteins in prospective cohorts for progression to T1D will be important to strengthen the evidence of causality and to decipher the direction of effect on disease risk. The study performed in this thesis using the TEDDY cohort was constrained by the small number of proteins with available proteomic measurements and by low statistical power to detect signals due to the limited sample size and the technical noise in transcript and protein measurements. Additional prospective cohorts with proteomics data, such as the Global Platform for the Prevention of Autoimmune Diabetes (GPPAD) study, the All Babies in Southeast Sweden (ABIS) study, and the Innovative approaches to understanding and arresting type 1 diabetes (INNODIA) study, are useful resources in which to validate putative core genes and proteins for T1D in the future. Overall, this work advances understanding of the genetic architecture of T1D, establishes a framework to identify core genes and proteins proximal to T1D pathogenesis, and provides human genetic evidence for prioritising drug targets for T1D.
Radical Harvest: Earth/Care/Reuse, Vol.3
(University of Edinburgh, 2026) Ferracina , Simone; Khan, Asad
Degree Show Catalogue documenting the second year of a two-year ESALA MArch (Integrated Pathway) studio, ‘Radical Harvest: Earth/Care/Reuse’. Studio Leaders: Simone Ferracina and Asad Khan. 2024-2026.