Educator to the nation : George S. Benson and modern American conservatism
View/ Open
word thesis.zip (78.54Mb)
Date
30/06/2015Author
Maxwell, Robbie John
Metadata
Abstract
This thesis examines the career of American conservative activist George S.
Benson (1898-1991), who served as President of the Church of Christ–affiliated
Harding College in Searcy, Arkansas (1936-1965) and rose to national prominence in
the early 1940s, when he established the National Education Program. This
examination provides an interpretation of the nature, origins and influence of modern
U.S. conservatism.
By focusing on the period from the 1930s to the mid-1960s, this work builds
on a number of recent studies that have demonstrated the significant advantages to
exploring modern conservatism beyond the social and political tumults of the 1960s
and 1970s. Benson’s efforts also reveal some flaws in the analytical paradigm that
dominates the literature on the modern right: the transition between conservatism’s
marginalization in the 1930s and its recapture of the political mainstream by the late
1970s. Tempering this ‘rise of the right’ narrative by accepting both the importance
and incompleteness of this resurgence provides the basis for the more nuanced
approach that defines this work. Benson’s efforts to promote conservatism were
defined – perhaps in equal measure – by failures, successes, and innovations. As a
result, his career provides a new perspective on the boundaries of modern
conservatism.
Much of the work on conservatism focuses on either elites or grassroots
activists. Benson operated within a space between these two groups that has rarely
been explored. His career relied, almost exclusively, on the financial support of
conservative businessmen, who shared his desire to effect a political re-education of
the American public. To do this, Benson utilized a remarkable range of outlets for his
message, which included a newspaper column, a radio broadcast, a relentless speaking
schedule, and the production of approximately fifty films. He also made pioneering
efforts to increase the influence of conservatism within the education system.
Benson’s appeal to businessmen also resided in his construction of an
innovative discourse for communicating the virtues of unfettered corporate
capitalism and challenging its critics. Drawing on his own youthful experiences in
Oklahoma, one of the last ‘frontier’ outposts, as well as the mythology of frontier
individualism and the discourse of populism, Benson offered a folksy rebuke of ‘big
government’ and embraced the corporate world as the heir to these virtues (despite
the obvious contradictions). Benson’s faith ensured that religion became the second
pillar of his ‘Americanism.’ His economic outlook constituted a prescient departure
from Church of Christ traditions that, like those of many Southern fundamentalist
and evangelical groups, harbored long-standing concerns that economic modernity
constituted a destabilizing and amoral influence over a society that required order,
stability and a primary dedication to non-worldly ideals. Moreover, Benson offers a
new insight into the confluence of the traditionalist and libertarian wings of the right,
a defining feature of the modern conservative movement.
Benson’s political vision resonated most profoundly in the South and
Southwest, where the heartland of modern conservatism emerged from a collision
between the region’s remarkable postwar economic transformation and its preexisting
religious and political culture. In a more general sense, certain themes within
Benson’s crusade, notably including the power and influence of organized labor,
provided key successes for the right during these years. These successes were
testament to the importance of favorable circumstances, but Benson’s career was
defined by the conviction that a more effective communication of conservatism
would solve the right’s problems throughout the nation; one key argument of this
work is that the message itself had notable limitations. These limitations, in turn,
reveal a more profound ambiguity towards conservatives’ economic message within
American political culture, the shortcomings of religious conservatism, and the
problematic and incomplete nature of Benson’s efforts to ‘fuse’ economic and social
conservatism. On the other hand, that conservatives’ ambitions were not met during
this period does not suggest that Benson operated in an era of political comity; in one
important respect, conservatives such as Benson helped to constrain political
discourse and ensure the persistent moderation of their opponents.