Pseudonymity, authorship, selfhood : the names and lives of Charlotte Brontë and George Eliot
Item Status
Embargo End Date
Date
Authors
Abstract
"Why did George Eliot live and Currer Bell die?" Victorian pseudonymity is seldom
treated to any critical scrutiny - the only sustained interest has been in reading
masculine pseudonyms as masks for "disreputable femininity," signs of the woman
writer's "anxiety of authorship." This thesis proposes that pseudonymity is not a
capitulation to gender ideology, but that a nom de plume is an exaggerated version of
any authorial signature - the abstraction (or Othering) of a self into text which
occurs in the production of "real" authors as well as fictional characters.
After an introductory chapter presenting the theoretical issues of selfhood and
authorship, I go on to discuss milieu - the contexts which produced Bronte and Eliot
- including a brief history of pseudonymous novelists and the Victorian publishing
and reviewing culture. The third and fourth chapters deal with pseudonymity as
heccéité, offering "biographies" of the authorial personas "Currer Bell" and "George
Eliot" rather than the women who created them, thus demonstrating the problems of
biography and the relative, multiple status of identity. The three following chapters
explore the concerns of pseudonymity through a reading of the novels: I treat Jane
Eyre, Villette, and even Shirley as "autobiographical" in order to address the
construction of self and narrative; I examine how Eliot's realist fictions (notably
Scenes of Clerical Life, Romola, Middlemarch and Daniel Deronda) trouble the
"reality"/"fiction" binary; and finally I read Bronte specifically for her engagement
with "dress," using queer theories of performativity with Victorian theories of
clothing and conduct to question "readability" itself. My final chapter is concerned
with agencement (adjustment) and "mythmaking": the posthumous biographical and
critical practices surrounding these two writers reveal that an author's "name,"
secured through literary reputation, is not static or inevitable, but the result of constant
process and revision.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

