British public opinion on France, the entente cordiale, and the Anglo-Russian entente: 1903-8
Item Status
Embargo End Date
Date
Authors
Abstract
The Anglo-French Entente received almost from the moment
of its inception the endorsement of the British people.
Although Anglo-French relations had been steadily improving
since the end of the Boer war and the denouement of the
Dreyfus affair, it was the warm and friendly greeting which
King Edward VII received during his State visit to Paris in
the spring of 1903 that first made the various quarters of
British public opinion desirous of a full-fledged understanding
with France. The conclusion of the colonial Convention of
8 April 1904 reinforced this desire. With the exception of
a handful of 'High Tories' and Imperialist stalwarts, most of
whom complained that Britain lost more territory and privileges
than she gained, the terms of this Convention proved acceptable
to the bulk of the nation. Most Conservatives and Liberal
Imperialists saw the Convention as a development which bolstered
Britain's position in the world and which helped the nation meet
the challenge of German expansionism, while most Radicals and
Socialists saw it as a peaceful event which heralded the
beginning of a series of bi-lateral pacts among the Powers,
including Germany.
Despite these high expectations, some disillusionment soon
set in in various quarters of public opinion. Businessmen who
nourished the idea that the rapprochement was economic as well
as political in its ramifications discovered to their dismay
that the Entente had done nothing to encourage the French to
abandon protectionism. The short-lived trade boom which
followed the signing of the 1904 Agreements was little compensation to them.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

