Sound change and social meaning: the perception and production of phonetic change in York, Northern England
View/ Open
Date
02/07/2018Author
Lawrence, Daniel
Metadata
Abstract
This thesis investigates the relationship between social meaning and linguistic
change. An important observation regarding spoken languages is that they are
constantly changing: the way we speak differs from generation to generation. A
second important observation is that spoken utterances convey social as well as
denotational meaning: the way we speak communicates something about who
we are. How, if at all, are these two characteristics of spoken languages related?
Many sociolinguistic studies have argued that the social meaning of linguistic
features is central to explaining the spread of linguistic innovations. A novel
form might be heard as more prestigious than the older form, or it may become
associated with specific social stereotypes relevant to the community in which
the change occurs. It is argued that this association between a linguistic variant
and social meaning leads speakers to adopt or reject the innovation, inhibiting
or facilitating the spread of the change. In contrast, a number of scholars have
argued that social meaning is epiphenomenal to many linguistic changes, which
are instead driven by an automatic process of convergence in face-to-face
interaction. The issue that such arguments raise is that many studies proposing
a role of social meaning in the spread of linguistic innovations rely on
production data as their primary source of evidence. Observing the variable
adoption of innovations across different groups of speakers (e.g. by gender,
ethnicity, or socioeconomic status), a researcher might draw on their
knowledge of the social history of the community under study to infer the role
of social meaning in that change. In many cases, the observed patterns of could
equally be explained by the social structure of the community under study,
which constrains who speaks to whom.
Are linguistic changes facilitated and inhibited by social meaning? Or is it rather
the case that social meaning arises as a consequence of linguistic change,
without necessarily influencing the change itself? This thesis explores these
questions through a study of vocalic change in York, Northern England, focusing
on the fronting and diphthongization of the tense back vowels /u/ and /o/. It
presents a systematic comparison of the social meanings listeners assign to
innovations (captured using perceptual methods), their social attitudes with
regard to those meanings (captured through sociolinguistic interviews), and
their use of those forms in production (captured through acoustic analysis). It is
argued that evidence of a consistent relationship between these factors would
support the proposal that social meaning plays a role in linguistic change.
The results of this combined analysis of sociolinguistic perception, social
attitudes and speech production provide clear evidence of diachronic /u/ and
/o/ fronting in this community, and show that variation in these two vowels is
associated with a range of social meanings in perception. These meanings are
underpinned by the notion of ‘Broad Yorkshire’ speech, a socially-recognized
speech register linked to notions of authentic local identity and social class.
Monophthongal /o/, diphthongal /u/, and back variants of both vowels are
shown to be associated with this register, implying that a speaker who adopts
an innovative form will likely be heard as less ‘Broad’. However, there is no
clear evidence that speakers’ attitudes toward regional identity or social class
have any influence on their adoption of innovations, nor that that their ability to
recognise the social meaning of fronting in perception is related to their
production behaviour. The fronting of /u/ is spreading in a socially-uniform
manner in production, unaffected by any social factor tested except for age. The
fronting of /o/ is conditioned by social network structure — speakers with
more diverse social networks are more likely to adopt the innovative form,
while speakers with closer social ties to York are more likely to retain a back
variant.
These findings demonstrate that York speakers hear back forms of /u/ and /o/
as more ‘local’ and ‘working class’ than fronter realizations, and express strong
attitudes toward the values and practices associated with regional identity and
social class. However, these factors do not appear to influence their adoption of
linguistic innovations in any straightforward manner, contrasting the
predictions of an account of linguistic change where social meaning plays a
central role in facilitating or inhibiting the propagation of linguistic innovations.
Based on these results, the thesis argues that many linguistic changes may
spread through the production patterns of a speech community without the
direct influence of social meaning, and advocates for the combined analysis of
sociolinguistic perception, social attitudes and speech production in future
work.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Fossils in an era of globalization, technology and climate change: what has changed and what has to be changed?
Shikanai, Mitsuru (The University of Edinburgh, 2014-08)This dissertation considers why inaction of people and governments against global and intergenerational injustice prompted by climate change and other environmental issues persists, and provides some theoretical and actual ... -
Social work's changing task : an analysis of the changing task of social work as seen through the history and development of one Scottish voluntary organisation, Family Care
Cree, Viviene E. (The University of Edinburgh, 1993)This thesis uses a case-study of the historical development of one Scottish voluntary social work agency - Family Care - as a vehicle for exploring the complex and changing nature of the social work task. I argue that ... -
Hesitations appear to make listeners more likely to detect the, …er, change: Evidence for lasting effects of hesitations on listeners from change-detection experiments
Osterrieth, Amélie (The University of Edinburgh, 2011-06-29)Everyday speech is littered with disfluencies like filled pauses (e.g. ‘er’, ‘um’), silent pauses, repetitions or repairs. Experimental evidence indicates that even though listeners may not consciously perceive disfluencies ...