Gait-related variability: a practical recovery marker in team sport athletes
View/ Open
Murray2020.pdf (8.298Mb)
Date
30/06/2020Item status
Restricted AccessEmbargo end date
30/06/2021Author
Murray, Andrew Michael
Metadata
Abstract
Recovery is important to both athletes and coaches as a key component of training
programmes and a determinant of optimal performance. At times the subsequent
performance is the ultimate measure of the success of the recovery. However, the
measurement of a quality should not affect its outcome measure and assessment
without incurring additional load, perhaps even without the knowledge of the athlete,
would be the ideal approach. This thesis was designed to examine recovery monitoring
methods in situ to meet the need of practitioners and athletes. Following an initial survey
of athletes from the UK (n=53), Asia (n=112) & USA (n=152), athletes from collegiate
American Football (males, n=63), collegiate soccer (females, n=17) and professional
rugby (males, n=47) were monitored across a full competitive season to measure the
associations of various recovery markers with gait-related variability measured at the
trunk.
The research process involved initially establishing how athletes consider recovery
relative to its importance and their subsequent practice. Survey studies of distinct groups
of athletes on three continents established athlete and coach perceptions around
recovery and showed that their perceptions did not necessarily match their behaviours
or their beliefs (for example, just over half of athletes rated sleep as the most impactful
recovery intervention but did not mirror that belief in their actions; whereas in contrast
~40% of athletes believed in and utilised cold water immersion). Subsequently the benefit
of measuring recovery within the sport activity and without additional external load was
chosen as the preferred approach. A discussion of movement variability assessment using existing accelerometry information collected for the management of external load
was undertaken with decisions made on an appropriate measure of gait-related
variability to track across longitudinal monitoring of athletes. This was in conjunction
with a variety of subjective and objective markers already collected in their own sport.
Primarily a quality assurance assessment of the chosen tool to identify high speed
running sections, occurring naturally within training and competition, matched to ensure
they occurred in a linear direction, and the subsequent marker of variability (coefficient
of mean determination), was undertaken. It was shown to be a stable and reliable marker
for both treadmill and over-ground running in the vertical and anterior-posterior axis. In
addition, it showed that analysis can occur interchangeably on data identified from GPS
(outdoor sports) and accelerometer-based assessments (indoor sports).
Having established the standard statistical approach for the investigations, three
different sporting models were examined using existing measures within their sport and
season to investigate if recovery can be effectively monitored without additional
requirements on the athlete. Firstly, American Football collegiate athletes were
monitored longitudinally to examine any associations between gait-related variability,
external load and subjective markers of wellness within their regular sessions.
Associations between gait-related variability and fatigue (p<0.026) and 7-day acute
training load (p<0.001) were established, supporting potential use in this context.
Secondly, in an additional population in the same collegiate environment, but in a
different sport, objective markers of flexibility within a female collegiate soccer population were examined, but showed no relationship between gait-related variability
and flexibility measured electronically. This suggests that these objective markers
cannot be associated with variability changes in this context.
Finally, a group of professional male rugby union athletes were monitored across their
playing season for a relationship between gait-related variability and additional objective
measures of recovery (sprint speed, manually measured flexibility and additional
screening measures). This population showed that changes in hours of sleep, sprint
performance, general flexibility, volume and intensity of sessions were associated with a
change in variability. This suggests a combination of subjective and objective measures
can be associated with variability in this context.
In conclusion, there is a disconnect between athlete perceptions and beliefs of recovery
behaviours; it is possible, through monitoring of accelerometry load alongside subjective
markers, to get an indication of recovery status of an individual athlete to optimize any
intervention to their training plan. This may drive further education of athletes around
recovery practices and suggestions for practitioners to establish a parsimonious
monitoring system with a combination of subjective and objective markers that could be
supplemented by movement variability measures.
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Personality Differences in Athletic and Non-Athletic Populations: Investigation of Personality Traits and States
Boulter, Matt (The University of Edinburgh, 2015) -
Enhancing athletic and psychic performances through the use of imagery based mental strategies
Taylor, Robin (The University of Edinburgh, 1993) -
Children and developmental co-ordination: entropy, resistance training and athletic fitness
Platt, Geoffrey K. (The University of Edinburgh, 2010)