Representations of the Northern Ireland 'Troubles' within the British media, 1973-1997
View/ Open
Doughty2020.pdf (5.822Mb)
Date
26/06/2020Item status
Restricted AccessEmbargo end date
26/06/2021Author
Doughty, Roseanna Jane
Metadata
Abstract
This thesis investigates British media representations of the conflict in Northern Ireland between 1973
and 1997, and how these affected the lived experiences of the Irish in Britain over this period. The
‘Troubles’ dominated headlines from the outbreak of communal violence in 1968. As the main source
of information on Northern Ireland for most British people, the press and broadcast media were central
to how the conflict was reported on and understood in Britain. The British press and broadcast media
offered multifaceted and detailed coverage of the conflict in Northern Ireland, contrary to the
assumptions made by various scholars, and the belief of many Irish people living in Britain at the time.
The prevailing view amongst the Irish in Britain was that the media merely regurgitated the official line,
producing one-dimensional coverage of Northern Ireland. Irish political and community activists in
Britain from the 1980s campaigned against the media’s allegedly oversimplified and biased reporting,
which they believed played a significant role in the discrimination and harassment experienced by the
Irish, especially as a result of the IRA bombing campaign in English cities. These activists were correct
in maintaining that the media contributed to the hostile environment experienced by many Irish people
living in Britain throughout the ‘Troubles’. Nevertheless, this does not mean that the press and
broadcasting bodies failed to engage with the complexities of the conflict in Northern Ireland or indeed
provide a critical view of the role of the British state. This thesis presents the findings of an in-depth
analysis of a broad and representative range of newspapers and television current affairs programmes.
Far from simply parroting the official line, the media resisted efforts by the state to dictate how the
‘Troubles’ were reported. The media provided far more nuanced, independent-minded and analytical
coverage of the conflict than has been acknowledged.