Exploitation of people with mental health problems: a critical discourse analysis of the role of mental health service policy in Scotland
Item Status
Embargo End Date
Date
Authors
Pachkowski, Katherine Sophia
Abstract
This thesis engages with the phenomenon of abuse and exploitation of
people with a diagnosis or experience of mental health problems. The thesis
focuses especially on exploitation that does not meet legal thresholds of
criminality. In this thesis, this type of exploitation is called “noncriminal
exploitation”. The research project was designed to answer the research
questions: RQ1) How does the relationship between society and people with
mental health problems affect or allow noncriminal exploitation of people with
mental health problems? RQ2) How are mental health service providers
represented in this relationship? RQ3) What are the obligations – moral or
otherwise - of mental health service providers in addressing noncriminal
exploitation of people with mental health problems? RQ4) Are existing
policies and procedures effective in protecting the rights of people with
mental health problems from exploitation?
To answer these questions, Foucauldian influenced critical discourse
analysis is applied as a theoretical orientation and methodological framework
to examine the policies that shape mental health services and practice in
Scotland; and the potential effects of these texts on the lives of people who
use those services, especially as it relates to exploitation of people who have
mental health problems. The actual and potential roles of mental health
services in preventing and addressing exploitation are examined.
An archive of policy and related documents relevant to mental health
services in Scotland was selected; 10 representative documents from this
archive were analysed for discursive themes, especially related to
exploitation. A focused analysis of the current Mental Health Strategy of
Scotland was conducted, to examine it both for internal discursive themes
and for the presence of broader themes which emerged from the archive.
Competing discursive narratives embedded within the archive were
discovered: Discourses that can be described as emancipatory and
empowering of people with mental health problems (Rights-Autonomy
discourses) are countered by discourses that embody paternalistic attitudes,
medicalization, and stigma (Harms-Paternalist discourses). This thesis
critically examines sample texts for the presence and effects of these
discourses; traces the discourses throughout the Scottish Mental Health
Strategy and discusses potential effects of these discourses.
When assessed by the stated goals of the Strategy and related policies,
these discourses impede progress towards development of services that are
person-centred and rights-based. This reinforces the marginalization of
people with mental health problems and can impede progress towards the
explicitly stated goals of the Strategy.
The thesis discusses the impact of these discursive realities on the issue of
non-criminal exploitation. Roles and obligations of mental health workers
encountering exploitation are explored. Policy solutions, as well as actions
aimed at mitigating Harms-Paternalist Discourses, are proposed.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

