Promoting lower-carbon lifestyles: the role of personal values, climate change communications and carbon allowances in processes of change
Files
Item Status
Embargo End Date
Date
Authors
Howell, Rachel Angharad
Abstract
Climate change is a pressing problem and substantial reductions in the greenhouse
gas emissions that cause it are necessary to avert the worst impacts predicted. The
UK has targeted an 80% reduction from 1990 emissions levels by 2050. This thesis
investigates how to promote behavioural changes that will reduce emissions
associated with individuals’ lifestyles, which comprise a significant proportion of the
UK total.
The thesis begins by appraising whether and how climate change
communications, specifically films, can succeed in changing attitudes and behaviour.
The impacts on viewers of the film The Age of Stupid were assessed using a fourstage
panel survey. Increased concern, motivation to act, and sense of agency felt
immediately after seeing the film did not persist, but respondents reported some
behavioural changes. The longer-term follow-up suggests that behavioural intentions
do not necessarily translate into action, but also revealed issues concerning the
reliability of participants’ causal attributions of their behaviour. These and other
challenges of conducting longitudinal studies of behavioural change related to
climate change communications are discussed. The thesis then uses a model of
behavioural change transposed from health psychology to analyse the processes of
change employed or depicted by four climate change films, in order to identify more
generally the strengths and limitations of films as means to promote mitigation
action, and to demonstrate the potential utility of the model in the field of proenvironmental
behaviour change.
The issue is then considered from the opposite angle, with an examination of
what has motivated individuals who have already adopted lower-carbon lifestyles.
Qualitative research reveals that protecting ‘the environment’ per se is not the
primary value stimulating most interviewees’ action; typically they were more
concerned about the impacts of climate change on people in developing countries.
Although analysis of a survey instrument showed that biospheric values are
important to the participants, they tended to score altruistic values significantly
higher. Thus it may not be necessary to promote biospheric values to encourage
lower-carbon lifestyles.
The final element of the work involved researching the opinions of members of
Carbon Rationing Action Groups, seeking to understand what can be learned from
their experiences of living with a carbon allowance, and the implications that the
findings may have for potential government policies, especially personal carbon
trading.
The thesis concludes that, given the scale of action required, the difficulties
individuals face when considering whether and how to adopt lower-carbon
behaviours, and the limited impact of initiatives such as Carbon Rationing Action
Groups and The Age of Stupid beyond a relatively small circle of people who tend to
exhibit particular traits (such as a preference for frugality), significant UK emissions
reductions will necessitate far-reaching legislation that will impact on everyday
practices and behaviour.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

