Utilitarianism, reform, and architecture - Edinburgh as exemplar
dc.contributor.advisor
Whyte, Iain Boyd
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Lowrey, John
en
dc.contributor.author
Qing, Feng
en
dc.date.accessioned
2010-05-28T10:56:20Z
dc.date.available
2010-05-28T10:56:20Z
dc.date.issued
2009
dc.description.abstract
Although the utilitarian character of modern architecture has been widely recognized, the
relationship between Utilitarianism and architectural practice has not been adequately
discussed. This thesis intends to contribute to this area with a historical study of the
interaction of Utilitarianism and architectural practice in the social reforms of 18th and 19th
century Britain. Edinburgh is used as an example to illuminate this historical process in more
detail.
From three angles: prison, poor relief and elementary education, this thesis discusses
how Utilitarians influenced the reform process and how architecture was used as significant
instruments to promote the reform schemes designed by Bentham and his followers.
In prison reform, Bentham created the architectural model of the Panopticon to build a
new punishment system based on disciplined prisons which could harmoniously align
individual interest and public interest. He later introduced the same ideology and the
Panopticon model into poor relief reform. Through the works of his followers, especially
Edwin Chadwick, these Utilitarian ideas largely shaped the new poor relief system in Britain.
Similar steps were later followed in elementary education reform. Together with the
establishment of the national systems of poor relief and elementary education, a large
volume of institutional buildings such as workhouses and board schools came into being, and
many of them are still affecting our modern life.
Based on these examples, this thesis ends with a theoretical discussion of the inadequacy
of Utilitarianism as a complete ethical theory. Contrary to the optimism of Bentham and his
19th century followers, Utilitarianism is insufficient to be a practical guidance for everyday
life. This inadequacy determines that Utilitarianism cannot provide a firm ethical foundation
for architecture.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/3430
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
utilitarianism
en
dc.subject
reform
en
dc.subject
architecture
en
dc.subject
workhouses
en
dc.subject
Edinburgh
en
dc.subject
teleology
en
dc.title
Utilitarianism, reform, and architecture - Edinburgh as exemplar
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

