History of feminist art history: remaking a discipline and its institutions
dc.contributor.advisor
Dimitrakaki, Angela
en
dc.contributor.advisor
Williams, Richard
en
dc.contributor.author
Horne, Victoria
en
dc.date.accessioned
2016-08-26T15:13:29Z
dc.date.available
2016-08-26T15:13:29Z
dc.date.issued
2015-06-27
dc.description.abstract
Recognising art’s crucial function for reproducing economic and sexual differences,
feminist political interventions - alongside a range of ‘new’ critical perspectives
including Marxism, psychoanalysis and poststructuralism - have wrought historic
changes upon the production, circulation and consumption of art. This is widely
acknowledged in art historical scholarship. However, understanding that ‘art history’
(as a historically conditioned discipline) is concurrently reproductive of these
ideological and material inequalities, feminist scholars have significantly and
continually sought to intervene at the point of production – the writing of art’s
history – to expose its social role and remake the fundamental terms of the discipline.
This is a truth less widely acknowledged or, at least, less well-understood within
contemporary scholarship.
This thesis, therefore, seeks to examine the discipline of art history in Anglo-
American contexts to assess the impact that feminist models of scholarship have had
upon its knowledges and practices. This is attained through extensive literature
overviews, archival research and, to a lesser extent, email interviews with key
contributors to the discourse. Ultimately, this examination endeavours to address the
production and regulation of feminist knowledge across a number of expanded (and
interconnected) institutional sites. Case studies track the impact of feminist strategies
upon the authoring of art history in the classroom, within scholarly professional
organisations, academic publishing, the museum sector, and upon art-making itself.
The research evaluates the mutable power structures of the discipline, how feminist
interventions have had success in rethinking the limits of institutional knowledge,
and how it may be possible to articulate critique under twenty-first-century
conditions of institutional complicity and the hegemonic recuperation (or indeed
‘disciplining’) of radical practices. To date – and despite its prominence within much
feminist writing - the importance of art historiography for the feminist political
project has not been properly examined; the aim of this thesis is therefore to redress
this omission and provide a timely and comprehensive critical reading of feminist
knowledge production since around 1970.
en
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/1842/16194
dc.language.iso
en
dc.publisher
The University of Edinburgh
en
dc.relation.hasversion
Horne, Victoria and Amy Tobin. ‘An Unfinished Revolution in Art Historiography, or How to Write a Feminist Art Historiography.’ Feminist Review 107 (2014): 75-83.
en
dc.subject
feminism
en
dc.subject
history of art
en
dc.subject
feminist interventions
en
dc.title
History of feminist art history: remaking a discipline and its institutions
en
dc.title.alternative
A history of feminist art history: remaking a discipline and its institutions
en
dc.type
Thesis or Dissertation
en
dc.type.qualificationlevel
Doctoral
en
dc.type.qualificationname
PhD Doctor of Philosophy
en
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Horne2015.pdf
- Size:
- 3 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

